Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for Qualcomm Bluetooth SoC QCA6390

[Matthias Kaehlcke]

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 05:43:27PM +0800, Rocky Liao wrote:
> This patch adds support for QCA6390, including the devicetree and acpi
> compatible hwid matching, and patch/nvm downloading.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rocky Liao <rjliao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c   | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h   |  8 +++++++
>  drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> index a16845c0751d..ca126e499c58 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
>  
>  #define VERSION "0.1"
>  
> +#define QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type)    \
> +	(soc_type == QCA_WCN3991 || soc_type == QCA_QCA6390)

This macro style is 3991 or 6390 is pretty ugly, IMO it's worse than the
problem it intends to solve.

I would either just spell out what the macro does, or if that becomes to
cumbersome (especially when more types are added) have a macro that checks
a bitmask like:

qca_soc_type_matches(soc_type, QCA_WCN3991 | QCA6390)

For this the SoC types read from FW would have to be mapped to a bit for
each SoC type, which could be done during initialization.

Another alternative could be to have a set of flags that indicate if a SoC
has certain characteristics (e.g. enhanced logging needs to be enabled),
these flags could be set during initialization.

> +
>  int qca_read_soc_version(struct hci_dev *hdev, u32 *soc_version,
>  			 enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type)
>  {
> @@ -32,7 +35,7 @@ int qca_read_soc_version(struct hci_dev *hdev, u32 *soc_version,
>  	 * VSE event. WCN3991 sends version command response as a payload to
>  	 * command complete event.
>  	 */
> -	if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991) {
> +	if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type)) {
>  		event_type = 0;
>  		rlen += 1;
>  		rtype = EDL_PATCH_VER_REQ_CMD;
> @@ -69,7 +72,7 @@ int qca_read_soc_version(struct hci_dev *hdev, u32 *soc_version,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991)
> +	if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type))
>  		memmove(&edl->data, &edl->data[1], sizeof(*ver));
>  
>  	ver = (struct qca_btsoc_version *)(edl->data);
> @@ -138,6 +141,29 @@ int qca_send_pre_shutdown_cmd(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qca_send_pre_shutdown_cmd);
>  
> +int qca_send_enhancelog_enable_cmd(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	int err;
> +	const u8 param[2] = {0x14, 0x01};
> +
> +	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "QCA enhanced log enable cmd");
> +
> +	skb = __hci_cmd_sync_ev(hdev, QCA_ENHANCED_LOG_ENABLE_CMD, 2,
> +				param, HCI_EV_CMD_COMPLETE, HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
> +		err = PTR_ERR(skb);
> +		bt_dev_err(hdev, "Enhanced log enable cmd failed (%d)", err);
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	kfree_skb(skb);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qca_send_enhancelog_enable_cmd);
> +
>  static void qca_tlv_check_data(struct qca_fw_config *config,
>  		const struct firmware *fw, enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type)
>  {
> @@ -217,7 +243,7 @@ static void qca_tlv_check_data(struct qca_fw_config *config,
>  				tlv_nvm->data[0] |= 0x80;
>  
>  				/* UART Baud Rate */
> -				if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991)
> +				if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type))
>  					tlv_nvm->data[1] = nvm_baud_rate;
>  				else
>  					tlv_nvm->data[2] = nvm_baud_rate;
> @@ -268,7 +294,7 @@ static int qca_tlv_send_segment(struct hci_dev *hdev, int seg_size,
>  	 * VSE event. WCN3991 sends version command response as a payload to
>  	 * command complete event.
>  	 */
> -	if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991) {
> +	if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type)) {
>  		event_type = 0;
>  		rlen = sizeof(*edl);
>  		rtype = EDL_PATCH_TLV_REQ_CMD;
> @@ -301,7 +327,7 @@ static int qca_tlv_send_segment(struct hci_dev *hdev, int seg_size,
>  		err = -EIO;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991)
> +	if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type))
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	tlv_resp = (struct tlv_seg_resp *)(edl->data);
> @@ -442,6 +468,11 @@ int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t baudrate,
>  			    (soc_ver & 0x0000000f);
>  		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
>  			 "qca/crbtfw%02x.tlv", rom_ver);
> +	} else if (soc_type == QCA_QCA6390) {
> +		rom_ver = ((soc_ver & 0x00000f00) >> 0x04) |
> +			    (soc_ver & 0x0000000f);
> +		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
> +			 "qca/htbtfw%02x.tlv", rom_ver);
>  	} else {
>  		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
>  			 "qca/rampatch_%08x.bin", soc_ver);
> @@ -464,6 +495,9 @@ int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t baudrate,
>  	else if (qca_is_wcn399x(soc_type))
>  		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
>  			 "qca/crnv%02x.bin", rom_ver);
> +	else if (soc_type == QCA_QCA6390)
> +		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
> +			 "qca/htnv%02x.bin", rom_ver);
>  	else
>  		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
>  			 "qca/nvm_%08x.bin", soc_ver);
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> index e16a4d650597..bc703817c3d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #define EDL_NVM_ACCESS_SET_REQ_CMD	(0x01)
>  #define MAX_SIZE_PER_TLV_SEGMENT	(243)
>  #define QCA_PRE_SHUTDOWN_CMD		(0xFC08)
> +#define QCA_ENHANCED_LOG_ENABLE_CMD     (0xFC17)
>  
>  #define EDL_CMD_REQ_RES_EVT		(0x00)
>  #define EDL_PATCH_VER_RES_EVT		(0x19)
> @@ -127,6 +128,7 @@ enum qca_btsoc_type {
>  	QCA_WCN3990,
>  	QCA_WCN3991,
>  	QCA_WCN3998,
> +	QCA_QCA6390,

QCA_QCAxxxx seems a bit redundant, why not call it QCA_6390 or QCA6390?
I also wouldn't be opposed to scrap the QCA_ prefixes from the WCN399x
types, this is the QCA Bluetooth driver, so it's pretty evident that
these are Qualcomm chips.