Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: soc: document LiteX SoC Controller bindings

[Mateusz Holenko]

Hi Maxime,

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:11 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Mateusz,
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 09:46:45AM +0100, Mateusz Holenko wrote:
> > From: Pawel Czarnecki <pczarnecki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add documentation for LiteX SoC Controller bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pawel Czarnecki <pczarnecki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> >     This commit has been introduced in v3 of the patchset.
> >
> >  .../soc/litex/litex,soc_controller.yaml       | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  MAINTAINERS                                   |  6 +++
> >  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc_controller.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc_controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc_controller.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..039894265319
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc_controller.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> > +PDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/litex/litex,soc_controller.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: LiteX SoC Controller driver
> > +
> > +description: |
> > +  This is the SoC Controller driver for the LiteX SoC Builder.
> > +  It's purpose is to verify LiteX CSR (Control&Status Register) access
> > +  operations and provide function for other drivers to read/write CSRs
> > +  and to check if those accessors are ready to use.
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Karol Gugala <kgugala@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > +  - Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    const: litex,soc_controller
>
> Usually compatible will use dash as separators, not underscores.
>
> > +  reg:
> > +    description: Base address and length of the register space
>
> This is usually removed since it's what's expected from the property
> anyway. However, what you should really test for in the number of
> address/size couples being set, and you can do that using maxItems: 1
>
> > +  status:
> > +    description: |
> > +      disables or enables node
> > +
> > +    const: "okay"
>
> This is added automatically by the tooling, so you can leave it out.
>
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +  - status
>
> And in general, status is not required. Leaving status out is
> equivalent to status = "okay"
>
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +
> > +  soc_ctrl0: soc_controller@f0000000 {
> > +                     compatible = "litex,soc_controller";
> > +                     reg = <0x0 0xf0000000 0x0 0xC>;
> > +                     status = "okay";
> > +  };
>
> The indentation looks weird here?
>
> Maxime

Thanks for all the comments!

I'll fix this file and resubmit the whole patchset after addressing
other remarks.

--
Mateusz Holenko
Antmicro Ltd | www.antmicro.com
Roosevelta 22, 60-829 Poznan, Poland