[PATCH 5.5 108/151] blk-iocost: fix incorrect vtime comparison in iocg_is_idle()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit dcd6589b11d3b1e71f516a87a7b9646ed356b4c0 upstream.

vtimes may wrap and time_before/after64() should be used to determine
whether a given vtime is before or after another. iocg_is_idle() was
incorrectly using plain "<" comparison do determine whether done_vtime
is before vtime. Here, the only thing we're interested in is whether
done_vtime matches vtime which indicates that there's nothing in
flight. Let's test for inequality instead.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 7caa47151ab2 ("blkcg: implement blk-iocost")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.4+
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 block/blk-iocost.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ static bool iocg_is_idle(struct ioc_gq *
 		return false;
 
 	/* is something in flight? */
-	if (atomic64_read(&iocg->done_vtime) < atomic64_read(&iocg->vtime))
+	if (atomic64_read(&iocg->done_vtime) != atomic64_read(&iocg->vtime))
 		return false;
 
 	return true;