Re: [PATCH 13/15] powerpc/watchpoint: Don't allow concurrent perf and ptrace events
From: Christophe Leroy
Date: Tue Mar 17 2020 - 07:16:37 EST
Le 09/03/2020 Ã 09:58, Ravi Bangoria a ÃcritÂ:
ptrace and perf watchpoints on powerpc behaves differently. Ptrace
On the 8xx, ptrace generates signal after executing the instruction.
watchpoint works in one-shot mode and generates signal before executing
instruction. It's ptrace user's job to single-step the instruction and
re-enable the watchpoint. OTOH, in case of perf watchpoint, kernel
emulates/single-steps the instruction and then generates event. If perf
and ptrace creates two events with same or overlapping address ranges,
it's ambiguous to decide who should single-step the instruction. Because
of this issue ptrace and perf event can't coexist when the address range
overlaps.
Ok, and then ? What's the purpose of this (big) patch ?
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 2 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 220 +++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 16 ++
3 files changed, 238 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
index ec61e2b7195c..6e1a19af5177 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ extern int hw_breakpoint_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *unused,
unsigned long val, void *data);
int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
void arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
+int arch_reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
+void arch_release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
void arch_unregister_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
void hw_breakpoint_pmu_read(struct perf_event *bp);
extern void flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(struct task_struct *tsk);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 2ac89b92590f..d8529d9151e8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -123,6 +123,226 @@ static bool is_ptrace_bp(struct perf_event *bp)
return (bp->overflow_handler == ptrace_triggered);
}
+struct breakpoint {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct perf_event *bp;
+ bool ptrace_bp;
+};
Don't we have an equivalent struct already ?
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct breakpoint *, cpu_bps[HBP_NUM_MAX]);
+static LIST_HEAD(task_bps);
+
+static struct breakpoint *alloc_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ struct breakpoint *tmp;
+
+ tmp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tmp)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ tmp->bp = bp;
+ tmp->ptrace_bp = is_ptrace_bp(bp);
+ return tmp;
+}
+
+static bool bp_addr_range_overlap(struct perf_event *bp1, struct perf_event *bp2)
+{
+ __u64 bp1_saddr, bp1_eaddr, bp2_saddr, bp2_eaddr;
+
+ bp1_saddr = bp1->attr.bp_addr & ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN;
+ bp1_eaddr = (bp1->attr.bp_addr + bp1->attr.bp_len - 1) | HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN;
+ bp2_saddr = bp2->attr.bp_addr & ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN;
+ bp2_eaddr = (bp2->attr.bp_addr + bp2->attr.bp_len - 1) | HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN;
+
+ return (bp1_saddr <= bp2_eaddr && bp1_eaddr >= bp2_saddr);
Would be better with something like (HW_BREAKPOINT_SIZE needs to be
defined).
bp1_saddr = ALIGN_DOWN(bp1->attr.bp_addr, HW_BREAKPOINT_SIZE);
bp1_eaddr = ALIGN(bp1->attr.bp_addr, HW_BREAKPOINT_SIZE);
bp2_saddr = ALIGN_DOWN(bp2->attr.bp_addr, HW_BREAKPOINT_SIZE);
bp2_eaddr = ALIGN(bp2->attr.bp_addr, HW_BREAKPOINT_SIZE);
return (bp1_saddr < bp2_eaddr && bp1_eaddr > bp2_saddr);
+}
+
+static bool alternate_infra_bp(struct breakpoint *b, struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ return is_ptrace_bp(bp) ? !b->ptrace_bp : b->ptrace_bp;
+}
+
+static bool can_co_exist(struct breakpoint *b, struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ return !(alternate_infra_bp(b, bp) && bp_addr_range_overlap(b->bp, bp));
+}
+
+static int task_bps_add(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ struct breakpoint *tmp;
+
+ tmp = alloc_breakpoint(bp);
+ if (IS_ERR(tmp))
+ return PTR_ERR(tmp);
+
+ list_add(&tmp->list, &task_bps);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void task_bps_remove(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ struct list_head *pos, *q;
+ struct breakpoint *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_safe(pos, q, &task_bps) {
+ tmp = list_entry(pos, struct breakpoint, list);
+
+ if (tmp->bp == bp) {
+ list_del(&tmp->list);
+ kfree(tmp);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * If any task has breakpoint from alternate infrastructure,
+ * return true. Otherwise return false.
+ */
+static bool all_task_bps_check(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ struct breakpoint *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(tmp, &task_bps, list) {
+ if (!can_co_exist(tmp, bp))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * If same task has breakpoint from alternate infrastructure,
+ * return true. Otherwise return false.
+ */
+static bool same_task_bps_check(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ struct breakpoint *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(tmp, &task_bps, list) {
+ if (tmp->bp->hw.target == bp->hw.target &&
+ !can_co_exist(tmp, bp))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static int cpu_bps_add(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ struct breakpoint **cpu_bp;
+ struct breakpoint *tmp;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ tmp = alloc_breakpoint(bp);
+ if (IS_ERR(tmp))
+ return PTR_ERR(tmp);
+
+ cpu_bp = per_cpu_ptr(cpu_bps, bp->cpu);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_wp_slots(); i++) {
+ if (!cpu_bp[i]) {
+ cpu_bp[i] = tmp;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void cpu_bps_remove(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ struct breakpoint **cpu_bp;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ cpu_bp = per_cpu_ptr(cpu_bps, bp->cpu);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_wp_slots(); i++) {
+ if (!cpu_bp[i])
+ continue;
+
+ if (cpu_bp[i]->bp == bp) {
+ kfree(cpu_bp[i]);
+ cpu_bp[i] = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static bool cpu_bps_check(int cpu, struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ struct breakpoint **cpu_bp;
+ int i;
+
+ cpu_bp = per_cpu_ptr(cpu_bps, cpu);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_wp_slots(); i++) {
+ if (cpu_bp[i] && !can_co_exist(cpu_bp[i], bp))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool all_cpu_bps_check(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (cpu_bps_check(cpu, bp))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * We don't use any locks to serialize accesses to cpu_bps or task_bps
+ * because are already inside nr_bp_mutex.
+ */
+int arch_reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (is_ptrace_bp(bp)) {
+ if (all_cpu_bps_check(bp))
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ if (same_task_bps_check(bp))
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ return task_bps_add(bp);
+ } else {
+ if (is_kernel_addr(bp->attr.bp_addr))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (bp->hw.target && bp->cpu == -1) {
+ if (same_task_bps_check(bp))
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ return task_bps_add(bp);
+ } else if (!bp->hw.target && bp->cpu != -1) {
+ if (all_task_bps_check(bp))
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ return cpu_bps_add(bp);
+ } else {
+ if (same_task_bps_check(bp))
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ ret = cpu_bps_add(bp);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = task_bps_add(bp);
+ if (ret)
+ cpu_bps_remove(bp);
+
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void arch_release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ if (!is_kernel_addr(bp->attr.bp_addr)) {
+ if (bp->hw.target)
+ task_bps_remove(bp);
+ if (bp->cpu != -1)
+ cpu_bps_remove(bp);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Perform cleanup of arch-specific counters during unregistration
* of the perf-event
diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
index 3cc8416ec844..b48d7039a015 100644
--- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -213,6 +213,15 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
list_del(&bp->hw.bp_list);
}
+__weak int arch_reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__weak void arch_release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+}
+
/*
* Function to perform processor-specific cleanup during unregistration
*/
@@ -270,6 +279,7 @@ static int __reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, u64 bp_type)
struct bp_busy_slots slots = {0};
enum bp_type_idx type;
int weight;
+ int ret;
/* We couldn't initialize breakpoint constraints on boot */
if (!constraints_initialized)
@@ -294,6 +304,10 @@ static int __reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, u64 bp_type)
if (slots.pinned + (!!slots.flexible) > nr_slots[type])
return -ENOSPC;
+ ret = arch_reserve_bp_slot(bp);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
toggle_bp_slot(bp, true, type, weight);
return 0;
@@ -317,6 +331,8 @@ static void __release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, u64 bp_type)
enum bp_type_idx type;
int weight;
+ arch_release_bp_slot(bp);
+
type = find_slot_idx(bp_type);
weight = hw_breakpoint_weight(bp);
toggle_bp_slot(bp, false, type, weight);
Christophe