Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] perf test: Test pmu-events aliases

[Jiri Olsa]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:02:19PM +0800, John Garry wrote:

SNIP

>  struct perf_pmu_test_event {
>  	struct pmu_event event;
> +
> +	/* extra events for aliases */
> +	const char *alias_str;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: For when PublicDescription does not exist in the JSON, we
> +	 * will have no long_desc in pmu_event.long_desc, but long_desc may
> +	 * be set in the alias.
> +	 */
> +	const char *alias_long_desc;
>  };
> +
>  static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = {
>  	{
>  		.event = {
> @@ -20,6 +31,8 @@ static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = {
>  			.desc = "L1 BTB Correction",
>  			.topic = "branch",
>  		},
> +		.alias_str = "event=0x8a",
> +		.alias_long_desc = "L1 BTB Correction",
>  	},
>  	{
>  		.event = {
> @@ -28,6 +41,8 @@ static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = {
>  			.desc = "L2 BTB Correction",
>  			.topic = "branch",
>  		},
> +		.alias_str = "event=0x8b",
> +		.alias_long_desc = "L2 BTB Correction",
>  	},
>  	{
>  		.event = {
> @@ -36,6 +51,8 @@ static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = {
>  			.desc = "Number of segment register loads",
>  			.topic = "other",
>  		},
> +		.alias_str = "umask=0x80,(null)=0x30d40,event=0x6",

ah so we are using other pmus because of the format definitions

why is there the '(null)' in there?

jirka