Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] perf test: Test pmu-events aliases
From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Tue Mar 17 2020 - 13:07:52 EST
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 04:41:04PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 17/03/2020 16:20, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:02:19PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > struct perf_pmu_test_event {
> > > struct pmu_event event;
> > > +
> > > + /* extra events for aliases */
> > > + const char *alias_str;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Note: For when PublicDescription does not exist in the JSON, we
> > > + * will have no long_desc in pmu_event.long_desc, but long_desc may
> > > + * be set in the alias.
> > > + */
> > > + const char *alias_long_desc;
> > > };
> > > +
> > > static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = {
> > > {
> > > .event = {
> > > @@ -20,6 +31,8 @@ static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = {
> > > .desc = "L1 BTB Correction",
> > > .topic = "branch",
> > > },
> > > + .alias_str = "event=0x8a",
> > > + .alias_long_desc = "L1 BTB Correction",
> > > },
> > > {
> > > .event = {
> > > @@ -28,6 +41,8 @@ static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = {
> > > .desc = "L2 BTB Correction",
> > > .topic = "branch",
> > > },
> > > + .alias_str = "event=0x8b",
> > > + .alias_long_desc = "L2 BTB Correction",
> > > },
> > > {
> > > .event = {
> > > @@ -36,6 +51,8 @@ static struct perf_pmu_test_event test_cpu_events[] = {
> > > .desc = "Number of segment register loads",
> > > .topic = "other",
> > > },
> > > + .alias_str = "umask=0x80,(null)=0x30d40,event=0x6",
> >
> > ah so we are using other pmus because of the format definitions
> >
>
> Hi jirka,
>
> > why is there the '(null)' in there?
> >
>
> Well this is just coming from the generated alias string in the pmu code,
> and it does not seem to be handling "period" argument properly. It needs to
> be checked.
nice, it found first issue already ;-)
jirka