Re: [PATCH] KVM: nSVM: check for EFER.SVME=1 before entering guest
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Thu Mar 19 2020 - 06:05:25 EST
On 18/03/20 19:40, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
>
> On 3/18/20 5:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> EFER is set for L2 using svm_set_efer, which hardcodes EFER_SVME to 1
>> and hides
>> an incorrect value for EFER.SVME in the L1 VMCB. Perform the check
>> manually
>> to detect invalid guest state.
>>
>> Reported-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Â arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 3 +++
>> Â 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> index 08568ae9f7a1..2125c6ae5951 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> @@ -3558,6 +3558,9 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm(struct
>> vcpu_svm *svm)
>> Â Â static bool nested_vmcb_checks(struct vmcb *vmcb)
>> Â {
>> +ÂÂÂ if ((vmcb->save.efer & EFER_SVME) == 0)
>> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ return false;
>> +
>> ÂÂÂÂÂ if ((vmcb->control.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_VMRUN)) == 0)
>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ return false;
>> Â
>
> Ah! This now tells me that I forgot the KVM fix that was supposed to
> accompany my patchset.
Heh, indeed. I was puzzled for a second after applying it, then decided
I would just fix it myself. :)
> Do we need this check in software ? I wasn't checking the bit in KVM and
> instead I was just making sure that L0 sets that bit based on the
> setting in nested vmcb:
The only effect of the function below over svm_set_efer is to guarantee
a vmrun error to happen. Doing the test in nested_vmcb_checks is more
consistent with other must-be-one bits such as the VMRUN intercept, and
it's also a smaller patch.
Paolo
>
> +static void nested_svm_set_efer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64
> nested_vmcb_efer)
> +{
> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ svm_set_efer(vcpu, nested_vmcb_efer);
> +
> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (!(nested_vmcb_efer & EFER_SVME))
> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->save.efer &= ~EFER_SVME;
> +}
> +
> Âstatic int is_external_interrupt(u32 info)
> Â{
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ info &= SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_MASK | SVM_EVTINJ_VALID;
> @@ -3554,7 +3562,7 @@ static void enter_svm_guest_mode(struct vcpu_svm
> *svm, u64
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ svm->vmcb->save.gdtr = nested_vmcb->save.gdtr;
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ svm->vmcb->save.idtr = nested_vmcb->save.idtr;
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ kvm_set_rflags(&svm->vcpu, nested_vmcb->save.rflags);
> -ÂÂÂÂÂÂ svm_set_efer(&svm->vcpu, nested_vmcb->save.efer);
> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ nested_svm_set_efer(&svm->vcpu, nested_vmcb->save.efer);
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ svm_set_cr0(&svm->vcpu, nested_vmcb->save.cr0);
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ svm_set_cr4(&svm->vcpu, nested_vmcb->save.cr4);
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (npt_enabled) {
>