Re: [RFC][PATCH 12/11] selftest/ftrace: Fix function trigger test to handle trace not disabling the tracer
From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Thu Mar 19 2020 - 09:04:44 EST
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:35:29 -0600
Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 9:13 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The ftrace selftest "ftrace - test for function traceon/off triggers"
> > enables all events and reads the trace file. Now that the trace file does
> > not disable tracing, and will attempt to continually read new data that is
> > added, the selftest gets stuck reading the trace file. This is because the
> > data added to the trace file will fill up quicker than the reading of it.
> >
> > By only enabling scheduling events, the read can keep up with the writes.
> > Instead of enabling all events, only enable the scheduler events.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!
> > ---
> > .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_traceonoff_triggers.tc | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> + linux-kselttest and my LF email.
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>