Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Better document the softlockup_panic sysctl

From: Guilherme Piccoli
Date: Thu Mar 19 2020 - 15:34:11 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [locks] 6d390e4b5d: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -96.6% regression"
Previous message: Jarod Wilson: "Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: don't auto-add link-local address to lag ports"
In reply to: Guilherme G. Piccoli: "[PATCH] Documentation: Better document the softlockup_panic sysctl"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This shows as it was sent by me, 15 minutes ago...I can't even imagine
what happened, I didn't resend that.
Sorry for the inconvenience!
Cheers,

Guilherme

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [locks] 6d390e4b5d: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -96.6% regression"
Previous message: Jarod Wilson: "Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: don't auto-add link-local address to lag ports"
In reply to: Guilherme G. Piccoli: "[PATCH] Documentation: Better document the softlockup_panic sysctl"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]