Re: lockdep warning in sys_swapon
From: Naohiro Aota
Date: Mon Mar 23 2020 - 17:59:14 EST
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:12:01PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:06:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 15:30:45 +0000 Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/23/20 15:17, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I hit the following 2 warnings when running with LOCKDEP=y on arm64 platform
> > (juno-r2), running on v5.6-rc6
> >
> > The 1st one is when I execute `swapon -a`. The 2nd one happens at boot. I have
> > /dev/sda2 as my swap in /etc/fstab
> >
> > Note that I either hit 1 OR 2, but didn't hit both warnings at the same time,
> > yet at least.
> >
> > /dev/sda2 is a usb flash drive, in case it matters somehow.
>
> By the way, I noticed that in claim_swapfile() if we fail we don't release the
> lock. Shouldn't we release the lock here?
>
> I tried with that FWIW, but it had no effect on the warnings.
>
I'll be sending the below into Linus this week.
I was hoping to hear from Darrick/Christoph (?) but it looks like the
right thing to do. Are you able to test it?
I had questions[1] about the patch, but nobody ever replied.
Sorry, I have overlooked that one. I'm replying here.
Sorry to wander in late, but I don't see how we unlock the inode in the
success case. Before this patch, the "if (inode) inode_unlock(inode);"
below out: would take care of this for both the success case and the
bad_swap case, but now that's gone, and AFAICT after this patch we only
unlock the inode when erroring out...
> +bad_swap_unlock_inode:
> + inode_unlock(inode);
...since we never goto bad_swap_unlock_inode when error == 0, correct?
Actually, this patch does not touch "if (inode) inode_unlock(inode);" below
the "out:" label, so we still have that "inode_unlock" after this patch and
it unlocks the inode in the success case.
--D
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20200212164956.GK6874@magnolia/
I think I'll add a cc:stable to this one.
From: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/swapfile.c: move inode_lock out of claim_swapfile
claim_swapfile() currently keeps the inode locked when it is successful,
or the file is already swapfile (with -EBUSY). And, on the other error
cases, it does not lock the inode.
This inconsistency of the lock state and return value is quite confusing
and actually causing a bad unlock balance as below in the "bad_swap"
section of __do_sys_swapon().
This commit fixes this issue by moving the inode_lock() and IS_SWAPFILE
check out of claim_swapfile(). The inode is unlocked in
"bad_swap_unlock_inode" section, so that the inode is ensured to be
unlocked at "bad_swap". Thus, error handling codes after the locking now
jumps to "bad_swap_unlock_inode" instead of "bad_swap".
=====================================
WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
5.5.0-rc7+ #176 Not tainted
-------------------------------------
swapon/4294 is trying to release lock (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key) at:
[<ffffffff8173a6eb>] __do_sys_swapon+0x94b/0x3550
but there are no more locks to release!
other info that might help us debug this:
no locks held by swapon/4294.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 5 PID: 4294 Comm: swapon Not tainted 5.5.0-rc7-BTRFS-ZNS+ #176
Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H87-PRO, BIOS 2102 07/29/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xa1/0xea
? __do_sys_swapon+0x94b/0x3550
print_unlock_imbalance_bug.cold+0x114/0x123
? __do_sys_swapon+0x94b/0x3550
lock_release+0x562/0xed0
? kvfree+0x31/0x40
? lock_downgrade+0x770/0x770
? kvfree+0x31/0x40
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
up_write+0x2d/0x490
? kfree+0x293/0x2f0
__do_sys_swapon+0x94b/0x3550
? putname+0xb0/0xf0
? kmem_cache_free+0x2e7/0x370
? do_sys_open+0x184/0x3e0
? generic_max_swapfile_size+0x40/0x40
? do_syscall_64+0x27/0x4b0
? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x38c/0x590
__x64_sys_swapon+0x54/0x80
do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x4b0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x7f15da0a0dc7
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200206090132.154869-1-naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx
Fixes: 1638045c3677 ("mm: set S_SWAPFILE on blockdev swap devices")
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/swapfile.c~mm-swap-move-inode_lock-out-of-claim_swapfile
+++ a/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -2899,10 +2899,6 @@ static int claim_swapfile(struct swap_in
p->bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
}
- inode_lock(inode);
- if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode))
- return -EBUSY;
-
return 0;
}
@@ -3157,36 +3153,41 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __use
mapping = swap_file->f_mapping;
inode = mapping->host;
- /* will take i_rwsem; */
error = claim_swapfile(p, inode);
if (unlikely(error))
goto bad_swap;
+ inode_lock(inode);
+ if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode)) {
+ error = -EBUSY;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
+ }
+
/*
* Read the swap header.
*/
if (!mapping->a_ops->readpage) {
error = -EINVAL;
- goto bad_swap;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
}
page = read_mapping_page(mapping, 0, swap_file);
if (IS_ERR(page)) {
error = PTR_ERR(page);
- goto bad_swap;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
}
swap_header = kmap(page);
maxpages = read_swap_header(p, swap_header, inode);
if (unlikely(!maxpages)) {
error = -EINVAL;
- goto bad_swap;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
}
/* OK, set up the swap map and apply the bad block list */
swap_map = vzalloc(maxpages);
if (!swap_map) {
error = -ENOMEM;
- goto bad_swap;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
}
if (bdi_cap_stable_pages_required(inode_to_bdi(inode)))
@@ -3211,7 +3212,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __use
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cluster_info) {
error = -ENOMEM;
- goto bad_swap;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
}
for (ci = 0; ci < nr_cluster; ci++)
@@ -3220,7 +3221,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __use
p->percpu_cluster = alloc_percpu(struct percpu_cluster);
if (!p->percpu_cluster) {
error = -ENOMEM;
- goto bad_swap;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
}
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct percpu_cluster *cluster;
@@ -3234,13 +3235,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __use
error = swap_cgroup_swapon(p->type, maxpages);
if (error)
- goto bad_swap;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
nr_extents = setup_swap_map_and_extents(p, swap_header, swap_map,
cluster_info, maxpages, &span);
if (unlikely(nr_extents < 0)) {
error = nr_extents;
- goto bad_swap;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
}
/* frontswap enabled? set up bit-per-page map for frontswap */
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRONTSWAP))
@@ -3280,7 +3281,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __use
error = init_swap_address_space(p->type, maxpages);
if (error)
- goto bad_swap;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
/*
* Flush any pending IO and dirty mappings before we start using this
@@ -3290,7 +3291,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __use
error = inode_drain_writes(inode);
if (error) {
inode->i_flags &= ~S_SWAPFILE;
- goto bad_swap;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
}
mutex_lock(&swapon_mutex);
@@ -3315,6 +3316,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __use
error = 0;
goto out;
+bad_swap_unlock_inode:
+ inode_unlock(inode);
bad_swap:
free_percpu(p->percpu_cluster);
p->percpu_cluster = NULL;
@@ -3322,6 +3325,7 @@ bad_swap:
set_blocksize(p->bdev, p->old_block_size);
blkdev_put(p->bdev, FMODE_READ | FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_EXCL);
}
+ inode = NULL;
destroy_swap_extents(p);
swap_cgroup_swapoff(p->type);
spin_lock(&swap_lock);
@@ -3333,13 +3337,8 @@ bad_swap:
kvfree(frontswap_map);
if (inced_nr_rotate_swap)
atomic_dec(&nr_rotate_swap);
- if (swap_file) {
- if (inode) {
- inode_unlock(inode);
- inode = NULL;
- }
+ if (swap_file)
filp_close(swap_file, NULL);
- }
out:
if (page && !IS_ERR(page)) {
kunmap(page);
_