Re: [PATCH linux hwmon-next v1 1/3] hwmon: (sbtsi) Add basic support for SB-TSI sensors
From: Kun Yi
Date: Mon Mar 23 2020 - 19:25:58 EST
Thanks for the review comments!
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 4:31 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 3/19/20 3:48 PM, Kun Yi wrote:
> > SB Temperature Sensor Interface (SB-TSI) is an SMBus compatible
> > interface that reports AMD SoC's Ttcl (normalized temperature),
> > and resembles a typical 8-pin remote temperature sensor's I2C interface
> > to BMC.
> >
> > This commit adds basic support using this interface to read CPU
> > temperature, and read/write high/low CPU temp thresholds.
> >
> > Test status: tested reading temp1_input, and reading/writing
> > temp1_max/min.
> >
>
> How do I instantiate this driver on a system with an AMD CPU
> (in other words, what is the i2c bus and the i2c address) ?
The i2c bus number would be the bus connected from BMC to the AMD CPU.
The i2c address is specified in the spec:
Section 6.3.1: The SB-TSI address is normally 98h for socket 0 and 90h
for socket 1, but it could vary based on hardware address select pins.
I will add this information to v2 commit message and the Documentation.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Kun Yi <kunyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 10 ++
> > drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c | 218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 229 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > index 05a30832c6ba..9585dcd01d1b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > @@ -1412,6 +1412,16 @@ config SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON
> > This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> > will be called raspberrypi-hwmon.
> >
> > +config SENSORS_SBTSI
> > + tristate "Emulated SB-TSI temperature sensor"
> > + depends on I2C
> > + help
> > + If you say yes here you get support for emulated temperature
> > + sensors on AMD SoCs with SB-TSI interface connected to a BMC device.
> > +
> > + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will
> > + be called sbtsi_temp.
> > +
> > config SENSORS_SHT15
> > tristate "Sensiron humidity and temperature sensors. SHT15 and compat."
> > depends on GPIOLIB || COMPILE_TEST
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > index b0b9c8e57176..cd109f003ce4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_POWR1220) += powr1220.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PWM_FAN) += pwm-fan.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON) += raspberrypi-hwmon.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_S3C) += s3c-hwmon.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SBTSI) += sbtsi_temp.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH56XX_COMMON)+= sch56xx-common.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH5627) += sch5627.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH5636) += sch5636.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c b/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f998d944a515
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +/*
> > + * sbtsi_temp.c - hwmon driver for a SBI Temperature Sensor Interface (SB-TSI)
> > + * compliant AMD SoC temperature device.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2020, Google Inc.
> > + * Copyright (c) 2020, Kun Yi <kunyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/hwmon.h>
> > +#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * SB-TSI registers only support SMBus byte data access. "_INT" registers are
> > + * the integer part of a temperature value or limit, and "_DEC" registers are
> > + * corresponding decimal parts.
> > + */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT 0x01 /* RO */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_STATUS 0x02 /* RO */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_CONFIG 0x03 /* RO */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_INT 0x07 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_INT 0x08 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC 0x10 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_DEC 0x13 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_DEC 0x14 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_REV 0xFF /* RO */
> > +
> > +#define SBTSI_CONFIG_READ_ORDER_SHIFT 5
> > +
> > +#define SBTSI_TEMP_MIN (0)
> > +#define SBTSI_TEMP_MAX (255875)
> > +#define SBTSI_REV_MAX_VALID_ID (4)
>
> Unnecessary ( ) around literals.
Will fix in v2.
>
> > +
> > +struct sbtsi_data {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct i2c_client *client;
> > + struct mutex lock;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * From SB-TSI spec: CPU temperature readings and limit registers encode the
> > + * temperature in increments of 0.125 from 0 to 255.875. The "high byte"
> > + * register encodes the base-2 of the integer portion, and the upper 3 bits of
> > + * the "low byte" encode in base-2 the decimal portion.
> > + *
> > + * e.g. INT=0x19, DEC=0x20 represents 25.125 degrees Celsius
> > + *
> > + * Therefore temperature in millidegree Celsius =
> > + * (INT + DEC / 256) * 1000 = (INT * 8 + DEC / 32) * 125
> > + */
> > +static inline int SBTSI_REGS_TO_TEMP(s32 integer, s32 decimal)
> > +{
> > + return (((u32)integer << 3) + ((u32)decimal >> 5)) * 125;
>
> Why pass s32 as parameter just to typecast to u32 ? The values
> are known to be between 0 and 255, and thus will never be negative,
> even with s32, so this is really unnecessary.
That's a good point, will fix in v2.
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Inversely, given temperature in millidegree Celsius
> > + * INT = (TEMP / 125) / 8
> > + * DEC = ((TEMP / 125) % 8) * 32
> > + * Caller have to make sure temp doesn't exceed 255875, the max valid value.
> > + */
> > +static inline void SBTSI_TEMP_TO_REGS(u32 temp, u8 *integer, u8 *decimal)
> > +{
> > + temp /= 125;
> > + *integer = temp >> 3;
> > + *decimal = (temp & 0x7) << 5;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t sbtsi_show_temp(struct device *dev,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > + struct sbtsi_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> > + s32 err, temp_int, temp_dec;
> > + u8 read_order;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * ReadOrder bit specifies the reading order of integer and decimal
> > + * part of CPU temp for atomic reads. If bit == 0, reading integer part
> > + * triggers latching of the decimal part, so integer part should be read
> > + * first. If bit == 1, read order should be reversed.
> > + */
> > + err = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SBTSI_REG_CONFIG);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + read_order = (u8)err & BIT(SBTSI_CONFIG_READ_ORDER_SHIFT);
> > +
> > + if (read_order == 0) {
> > + temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT);
> > + temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC);
> > + } else {
> > + temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC);
> > + temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (temp_int < 0)
> > + return temp_int;
> > + if (temp_dec < 0)
> > + return temp_dec;
> > +
> > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n",
> > + SBTSI_REGS_TO_TEMP(temp_int, temp_dec));
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define sbtsi_show_temp_limit(name, REG) \
> > +static ssize_t sbtsi_show_##name(struct device *dev, \
> > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) \
> > +{ \
> > + struct sbtsi_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
> > + struct i2c_client *client = data->client; \
> > + s32 temp_int, temp_dec; \
> > +\
> > + temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, REG##_INT); \
> > + temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, REG##_DEC); \
> > +\
> > + if (temp_int < 0) \
> > + return temp_int; \
> > + if (temp_dec < 0) \
> > + return temp_dec; \
> > +\
> > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", \
> > + SBTSI_REGS_TO_TEMP(temp_int, temp_dec)); \
> > +}
> > +
> > +sbtsi_show_temp_limit(temp1_min, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW);
> > +sbtsi_show_temp_limit(temp1_max, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH);
> > +
> > +#define sbtsi_set_temp_limit(name, REG) \
> > +static ssize_t sbtsi_set_##name(struct device *dev, \
> > + struct device_attribute *attr, \
> > + const char *buf, size_t count) \
> > +{ \
> > + struct sbtsi_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
> > + struct i2c_client *client = data->client; \
> > + long val; \
> > + u8 temp_int, temp_dec; \
> > + int err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val); \
> > + if (err) \
> > + return err; \
> > +\
> > + val = clamp_val(val, SBTSI_TEMP_MIN, SBTSI_TEMP_MAX); \
> > + mutex_lock(&data->lock); \
> > + SBTSI_TEMP_TO_REGS(val, &temp_int, &temp_dec); \
> > + i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, REG##_INT, temp_int); \
> > + i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, REG##_DEC, temp_dec); \
> > + mutex_unlock(&data->lock); \
> > +\
> > + return count; \
> > +}
> > +
> > +sbtsi_set_temp_limit(temp1_min, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW);
> > +sbtsi_set_temp_limit(temp1_max, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH);
> > +
> > +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_input, 0444, sbtsi_show_temp, NULL, 0);
> > +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_min, 0644, sbtsi_show_temp1_min,
> > + sbtsi_set_temp1_min, 1);
> > +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_max, 0644, sbtsi_show_temp1_max,
> > + sbtsi_set_temp1_max, 2);
> > +
> > +static struct attribute *sbtsi_attrs[] = {
> > + &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_input.dev_attr.attr,
> > + &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_min.dev_attr.attr,
> > + &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_max.dev_attr.attr,
> > + NULL,
> > +};
> > +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(sbtsi);
> > +
> > +static int sbtsi_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > + struct device *hwmon_dev;
> > + struct sbtsi_data *data;
> > +
> > + data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct sbtsi_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!data)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + data->client = client;
> > + mutex_init(&data->lock);
> > +
> > + hwmon_dev =
> > + devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups(dev, client->name, data,
> > + sbtsi_groups);
>
> Please rewrite to use the devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info() API.
Done in v2.
>
> > + if (IS_ERR(hwmon_dev))
> > + return PTR_ERR(hwmon_dev);
> > +
> > + dev_info(dev, "sensor '%s'\n", client->name);
>
> Is that really valuable / necessary ?
Removed in v2.
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct i2c_device_id sbtsi_id[] = {
> > + {"sbtsi", 0},
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, sbtsi_id);
> > +
> > +static struct i2c_driver sbtsi_driver = {
> > + .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "sbtsi",
> > + },
> > + .probe = sbtsi_probe,
> > + .id_table = sbtsi_id,
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_i2c_driver(sbtsi_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Kun Yi <kunyi@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Hwmon driver for AMD SB-TSI emulated sensor");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >
>
--
Regards,
Kun