Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: LAPIC: Don't need to clear IPI delivery status in x2apic mode

[Sean Christopherson]

On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 05:40:03PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 2020, at 11:46 PM, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Cc more people,
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 08:35, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 01/04/20 02:19, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >>> -             /* No delay here, so we always clear the pending bit */
> >>> -             val &= ~(1 << 12);
> >>> +             /* Immediately clear Delivery Status in xAPIC mode */
> >>> +             if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic))
> >>> +                     val &= ~(1 << 12);
> >> 
> >> This adds a conditional, and the old behavior was valid according to the
> >> SDM: "software should not assume the value returned by reading the ICR
> >> is the last written value".
> > 
> > Nadav, Sean, what do you think?
> 
> I do not know. But if you write a KVM unit-test, I can run it on bare-metal
> and give you feedback about how it behaves.

I agree with Paolo, clearing the bit doesn't violate the SDM.  The
conditional is just as costly as the AND, if not more so, even for x2APIC.

I would play it safe and clear the bit even in the x2APIC only path to
avoid tripping up guest kernels that loop on the delivery status even when
using x2APIC.