Re: [patch v3 3/4] EDAC: synopsys: Add edac driver support for i.MX8MP
From: Robert Richter
Date: Thu Apr 02 2020 - 03:22:28 EST
On 02.04.20 09:20:32, Sherry Sun wrote:
> Since i.MX8MP use synopsys ddr controller IP, so add edac support
> for i.MX8MP based on synopsys edac driver. i.MX8MP use LPDDR4 and
> support interrupts for corrected and uncorrected errors. The main
> difference between ZynqMP and i.MX8MP ddr controller is the interrupt
> registers. So add another interrupt handler function, enable/disable
> interrupt function to distinguish with ZynqMP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> +static void enable_intr_imx8mp(struct synps_edac_priv *priv)
> +{
> + int regval;
> +
> + regval = readl(priv->baseaddr + ECC_CLR_OFST);
> + regval |= (DDR_CE_INTR_EN_MASK | DDR_UE_INTR_EN_MASK);
> + writel(regval, priv->baseaddr + ECC_CLR_OFST);
> +}
> +
> +static void disable_intr_imx8mp(struct synps_edac_priv *priv)
> +{
> + int regval;
> +
> + regval = readl(priv->baseaddr + ECC_CLR_OFST);
> + regval &= ~(DDR_CE_INTR_EN_MASK | DDR_UE_INTR_EN_MASK);
> + writel(regval, priv->baseaddr + ECC_CLR_OFST);
> +}
> +
> +/* Interrupt Handler for ECC interrupts on imx8mp platform. */
> +static irqreturn_t intr_handler_imx8mp(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + const struct synps_platform_data *p_data;
> + struct mem_ctl_info *mci = dev_id;
> + struct synps_edac_priv *priv;
> + int status, regval;
> +
> + priv = mci->pvt_info;
> + p_data = priv->p_data;
> +
> + regval = readl(priv->baseaddr + ECC_STAT_OFST);
> + if (!(regval & ECC_INTR_MASK))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + status = p_data->get_error_info(priv);
> + if (status)
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + priv->ce_cnt += priv->stat.ce_cnt;
> + priv->ue_cnt += priv->stat.ue_cnt;
> + handle_error(mci, &priv->stat);
> +
> + edac_dbg(3, "Total error count CE %d UE %d\n",
> + priv->ce_cnt, priv->ue_cnt);
> + enable_intr_imx8mp(priv);
Why do you enable interrupts here?
-Robert
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}