Re: [PATCH] ACPI: PPTT: Inform user that table offset used for Physical processor node ID
From: Jeremy Linton
Date: Thu Apr 02 2020 - 10:54:37 EST
Hi,
On 4/2/20 9:51 AM, John Garry wrote:
On 02/04/2020 14:55, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
On 4/2/20 7:22 AM, John Garry wrote:
If the the Processor ID valid is not set for a Physical Processor
Package
node, then the node table offset is used as a substitute. As such, we
may get info like this from sysfs:
root@(none)$ pwd
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology
root@(none)$ more physical_package_id
56
Inform the user of this in the bootlog, as it is much less than
ideal, and
they can remedy this in their FW.
This topic was originally discussed in:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/c325cfe2-7dbf-e341-7f0f-081b6545e890@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m0ec18637d8586f832084a8a6af22580e6174669a
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
index 4ae93350b70d..b4ed3c818e00 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
@@ -515,6 +515,8 @@ static int topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(struct
acpi_table_header *table,
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (level == 0 ||
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ cpu_node->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_PROCESSOR_ID_VALID)
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ return cpu_node->acpi_processor_id;
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (level == PPTT_ABORT_PACKAGE)
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ pr_notice_once("Physical package node Processor ID valid
not set, will use table offset as substitute\n");
Hi Jeremy,
What happens in the find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetro_id() case, if the
last IDENTICAL node isn't a socket/etc. Are we expecting to warn of a
missing processor container there as well?
ok, I could just use this then:
if (flags & ACPI_PPTT_PHYSCIAL_PACKAGE)
ÂÂÂÂpr_notice_once("Physical package node Processor ID ...")
I think that is a better plan.
As I recall, this tag for hetro id is not exposed to userspace (yet).
Correct.