Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: initialize deferred pages with interrupts enabled

[Pavel Tatashin]

> > I do wonder if this change is strictly required in this patch (IOW, if
> > we could keep calling touch_nmi_watchdog() also without holding a spinlock)
>
> Exactly. I would go with your patch on top.
>
> > Anyhow, it's the right thing to do.

Michal,

The reason I changed it here is because in the original patch that
this patch fixes we changed cond_sched() to touch_nmi_watchdog():
$ git show 3a2d7fa8a3d5 | grep -E '(nmi|sched)'
- cond_resched();
+ touch_nmi_watchdog();
- cond_resched();
+ touch_nmi_watchdog();

So, should I move it to a separate patch or is it OK to keep it here?

Thank you,
Pasha