Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] media: i2c: ov5645: Turn probe error into warning for xvclk frequency mismatch

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Prabhakar,

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:43 PM Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> PLL's on platforms might not be so accurate enough to generate the
> required clock frequency, so instead of erroring out on xvlck frequency

xvclk? (but see below)

> mismatch just warn the user and continue ahead in probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

Like for 2/5, what about the xvclk naming?

> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> @@ -1103,11 +1103,8 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>         }
>         /* external clock must be 24MHz, allow 1% tolerance */
>         xclk_freq = clk_get_rate(ov5645->xclk);
> -       if (xclk_freq < 23760000 || xclk_freq > 24240000) {
> -               dev_err(dev, "external clock frequency %u is not supported\n",
> -                       xclk_freq);
> -               return -EINVAL;
> -       }
> +       if (xclk_freq < 23760000 || xclk_freq > 24240000)
> +               dev_warn(dev, "xvclk mismatched, modes are based on 24MHz\n");

Calling it "xvclk" here will confuse the user, as the clock is named
"xclk" in DT?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds