Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] power: supply: core: tabularize HWMON temperature labels

[Nick Desaulniers]

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:56 PM MichaÅ MirosÅaw <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 11:13:50AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 6:53 PM kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi "MichaÅ,
> > >
> > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> > >
> > > [auto build test WARNING on power-supply/for-next]
> > > [also build test WARNING on hwmon/hwmon-next linus/master v5.6 next-20200404]
> > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> > > improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> > > base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> > >
> > > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Micha-Miros-aw/extensions-and-fixes/20200405-044024
> > > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-power-supply.git for-next
> > > config: x86_64-randconfig-b002-20200405 (attached as .config)
> > > compiler: clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 62f3a9650a9f289a07a5f480764fb655178c2334)
> > > reproduce:
> > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > >         COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64
> > >
> > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >
> > > >> drivers/power/supply/power_supply_hwmon.o: warning: objtool: power_supply_hwmon_read_string() falls through to next function power_supply_hwmon_write()
> >
> > I'm guessing this is from the unreachable:
> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b8b2d14ca46ca54257f55c9af58ea25695b9ee36
> > I'll need to play with this some more as I couldn't reproduce with a
> > simplified test case, but looks like a compiler bug.  Filed
> > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/978 for me to track.
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Just guessing: have you tried adding another unrelated function to the
> testcase? I would expect that 'fall through to next function' needs
> some other function to match.

I was throwing the test case linked into godbolt and looking at the
generated assembly.  It contained no jumps, only movs and conditional
movs.  Thank you for the suggestion.


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers