[PATCH v3 08/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Don't double-check rpmh

[Douglas Anderson]

The calls rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data() and rpmh_rsc_send_data() are only
ever called from rpmh.c.  We know that rpmh.c already error checked
the message.  There's no reason to do it again in rpmh-rsc.

Suggested-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes in v3:
- ("Don't double-check rpmh") replaces ("Warning if tcs_write...")

Changes in v2: None

 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 18 +-----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
index 9502e7ea96be..10c026b2e1bc 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ static int tcs_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
 }
 
 /**
- * rpmh_rsc_send_data() - Validate the incoming message + write to TCS block.
+ * rpmh_rsc_send_data() - Write / trigger active-only message.
  * @drv: The controller.
  * @msg: The data to be sent.
  *
@@ -658,12 +658,6 @@ int rpmh_rsc_send_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!msg || !msg->cmds || !msg->num_cmds ||
-	    msg->num_cmds > MAX_RPMH_PAYLOAD) {
-		WARN_ON(1);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	do {
 		ret = tcs_write(drv, msg);
 		if (ret == -EBUSY) {
@@ -734,16 +728,6 @@ int rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!msg || !msg->cmds || !msg->num_cmds ||
-	    msg->num_cmds > MAX_RPMH_PAYLOAD) {
-		pr_err("Payload error\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	/* Data sent to this API will not be sent immediately */
-	if (msg->state == RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	tcs = get_tcs_for_msg(drv, msg);
 	if (IS_ERR(tcs))
 		return PTR_ERR(tcs);
-- 
2.26.0.292.g33ef6b2f38-goog