Re: R: R: [PATCH v2 01/10] PCIe: qcom: add missing ipq806x clocks in PCIe driver

[Stanimir Varbanov]

On 4/8/20 3:55 PM, ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> in PCIe driver
>>
>> Hi Ansuel,
>>
>> On 4/8/20 3:36 PM, ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> PCIe driver
>>>>
>>>> Ansuel,
>>>>
>>>> On 4/2/20 3:11 PM, Ansuel Smith wrote:
>>>>> Aux and Ref clk are missing in pcie qcom driver.
>>>>> Add support in the driver to fix pcie inizialization in ipq806x.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 82a82383 PCI: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe controller driver
>>>>
>>>> this should be:
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 82a823833f4e PCI: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe controller driver
>>>>
>>>> and add:
>>>>
>>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.5+
>>>>
>>>> But, I wonder, as apq8064 shares the same ops_2_1_0 how it worked
>> until
>>>> now. Something more I cannot find such clocks for apq8064, which
>> means
>>>> that this patch will break it.
>>>>
>>>> One option is to use those new clocks only for ipq806x.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How to add this new clocks only for ipq806x? Check the compatible and
>> add
>>> them accordingly?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, through of_device_is_compatible(). See how we done this in
>> qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_4_0.
>>
>> I thought about second option though - encoder what clocks we have for
>> any SoC but if you take into that direction you have to change the whole
>> driver :)
>>
>> Another option is to use clk_get_optional() for the clocks which you
>> have on ipq806x (and don't have on apq8064). Please research this one
>> first.
>>
>> --
>> regards,
>> Stan
> 
> Ok I will use get optional for the extra clocks. Should I add a warning if they 
> are not present? Also what about the extra reset? Should I follow the same
> approach? 
> Thx for the suggestions. 
> 

No warnings please. You should follow the same rules for resets.

-- 
regards,
Stan