RE: [PATCH] selftests: add 'show_targets' make target

From: Bird, Tim
Date: Wed Apr 08 2020 - 15:13:34 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: shuah <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On 3/13/20 4:23 PM, tbird20d@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > It is useful for CI systems to be able to query the list
> > of targets provided by kselftest by default, so that they
> > can construct their own loop over the targets if desired.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Bird <tim.bird@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> > index 63430e2..9955e71 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> > @@ -246,4 +246,7 @@ clean:
> > $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$TARGET clean;\
> > done;
> >
> > +show_targets:
> > + @echo $(TARGETS)
> > +
> > .PHONY: khdr all run_tests hotplug run_hotplug clean_hotplug run_pstore_crash install clean
> >
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> It is useful addition. Output is hard to read though. It would
> be helpful to improve the printing targets.
>
> make -C tools/testing/selftests/ show_targets
> make: Entering directory '/lkml/linux_5.7/tools/testing/selftests'
> android arm64 bpf breakpoints capabilities cgroup clone3 cpufreq
> cpu-hotplug drivers/dma-buf efivarfs exec filesystems
> filesystems/binderfs filesystems/epoll firmware ftrace futex gpio
> intel_pstate ipc ir kcmp kexec kvm lib livepatch lkdtm membarrier memfd
> memory-hotplug mount mqueue net net/forwarding net/mptcp netfilter nsfs
> pidfd pid_namespace powerpc proc pstore ptrace openat2 rseq rtc seccomp
> sigaltstack size sparc64 splice static_keys sync sysctl timens timers
> tmpfs tpm2 user vm x86 zram
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah

OK. I did this mainly for test automation, so I was only
concerned about machine readability. I have code that looks
like this:

TARGET_LIST=$(make --no-print-directory -s -C tools/testing/selftests show_targets)

However, I'd agree that the output is not great for humans.

How would you like it improved? Would you like it shown as a single column?
Or indented? Or using some organization besides alphabetical?

Let me know and I'll implement something.
-- Tim