[PATCH 06/10] KVM: selftests: Add "delete" testcase to set_memory_region_test
From: Sean Christopherson
Date: Fri Apr 10 2020 - 19:17:29 EST
Add a testcase for deleting memslots while the guest is running.
Like the "move" testcase, this is x86_64-only as it relies on MMIO
happening when a non-existent memslot is encountered.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../kvm/x86_64/set_memory_region_test.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_memory_region_test.c
index 629dd8579b73..b556024af683 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_memory_region_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_memory_region_test.c
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
static const uint64_t MMIO_VAL = 0xbeefull;
+extern const uint64_t final_rip_start;
+extern const uint64_t final_rip_end;
+
static sem_t vcpu_ready;
static inline uint64_t guest_spin_on_val(uint64_t spin_val)
@@ -203,6 +206,89 @@ static void test_move_memory_region(void)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
+static void guest_code_delete_memory_region(void)
+{
+ uint64_t val;
+
+ GUEST_SYNC(0);
+
+ /* Spin until the memory region is deleted. */
+ val = guest_spin_on_val(0);
+ GUEST_ASSERT_1(val == MMIO_VAL, val);
+
+ /* Spin until the memory region is recreated. */
+ val = guest_spin_on_val(MMIO_VAL);
+ GUEST_ASSERT_1(val == 0, val);
+
+ /* Spin until the memory region is deleted. */
+ val = guest_spin_on_val(0);
+ GUEST_ASSERT_1(val == MMIO_VAL, val);
+
+ asm("1:\n\t"
+ ".pushsection .rodata\n\t"
+ ".global final_rip_start\n\t"
+ "final_rip_start: .quad 1b\n\t"
+ ".popsection");
+
+ /* Spin indefinitely (until the code memslot is deleted). */
+ guest_spin_on_val(MMIO_VAL);
+
+ asm("1:\n\t"
+ ".pushsection .rodata\n\t"
+ ".global final_rip_end\n\t"
+ "final_rip_end: .quad 1b\n\t"
+ ".popsection");
+
+ GUEST_ASSERT_1(0, 0);
+}
+
+static void test_delete_memory_region(void)
+{
+ pthread_t vcpu_thread;
+ struct kvm_regs regs;
+ struct kvm_run *run;
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+
+ vm = spawn_vm(&vcpu_thread, guest_code_delete_memory_region);
+
+ /* Delete the memory region, the guest should not die. */
+ vm_mem_region_delete(vm, MEM_REGION_SLOT);
+ wait_for_vcpu();
+
+ /* Recreate the memory region. The guest should see "0". */
+ vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS_THP,
+ MEM_REGION_GPA, MEM_REGION_SLOT,
+ MEM_REGION_SIZE / getpagesize(), 0);
+ wait_for_vcpu();
+
+ /* Delete the region again so that there's only one memslot left. */
+ vm_mem_region_delete(vm, MEM_REGION_SLOT);
+ wait_for_vcpu();
+
+ /*
+ * Delete the primary memslot. This should cause an emulation error or
+ * shutdown due to the page tables getting nuked.
+ */
+ vm_mem_region_delete(vm, 0);
+
+ pthread_join(vcpu_thread, NULL);
+
+ run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN ||
+ run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR,
+ "Unexpected exit reason = %d", run->exit_reason);
+
+ vcpu_regs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, ®s);
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(regs.rip >= final_rip_start &&
+ regs.rip < final_rip_end,
+ "Bad rip, expected 0x%lx - 0x%lx, got 0x%llx\n",
+ final_rip_start, final_rip_end, regs.rip);
+
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int i, loops;
@@ -215,8 +301,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
else
loops = 10;
+ pr_info("Testing MOVE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops);
for (i = 0; i < loops; i++)
test_move_memory_region();
+ pr_info("Testing DELETE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops);
+ for (i = 0; i < loops; i++)
+ test_delete_memory_region();
+
return 0;
}
--
2.26.0