[PATCH 5.5 24/44] RDMA/cma: Teach lockdep about the order of rtnl and lock
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sat Apr 11 2020 - 08:23:39 EST
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 32ac9e4399b12d3e54d312a0e0e30ed5cd19bd4e upstream.
This lock ordering only happens when bonding is enabled and a certain
bonding related event fires. However, since it can happen this is a global
restriction on lock ordering.
Teach lockdep about the order directly and unconditionally so bugs here
are found quickly.
See https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=55de90ab5f44172b0c90
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200227203651.GA27185@xxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
@@ -4746,6 +4746,19 @@ static int __init cma_init(void)
{
int ret;
+ /*
+ * There is a rare lock ordering dependency in cma_netdev_callback()
+ * that only happens when bonding is enabled. Teach lockdep that rtnl
+ * must never be nested under lock so it can find these without having
+ * to test with bonding.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) {
+ rtnl_lock();
+ mutex_lock(&lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&lock);
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ }
+
cma_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("rdma_cm", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
if (!cma_wq)
return -ENOMEM;