Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Move common definition to fsl_asrc_common

[Nicolin Chen]

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:16:31AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:08 AM Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 01:49:43PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> >
> > > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
> > > > > index b15946e03380..5cf0468ce6e3 100644
> > > > > --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
> > > > > +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
> > > >
> > > > > @@ -311,11 +311,12 @@ static int fsl_asrc_dma_startup(struct snd_soc_component *component,
> > > > >               return ret;
> > > > >       }
> > > > >
> > > > > -     pair = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fsl_asrc_pair), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > > +     pair = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fsl_asrc_pair) + PAIR_PRIVAT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > >
> > > > If we only use the PAIR_PRIVATE_SIZE here, maybe we can put the
> > > > define in this file too, rather than in the header file.
> > > >
> > > > And could fit 80 characters:
> > > >
> > > > +       pair = kzalloc(sizeof(*pair) + PAIR_PRIVAT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > > I will use a function pointer
> > >     int (*get_pair_priv_size)(void)
> >
> > Since it's the size of pair or cts structure, could be just a
> > size_t variable?
> 
> Yes, should be "size_t (*get_pair_priv_size)(void)"

Does it have to be a function? -- how about this:

struct pair {
	...
	size_t private_size;
	void *private;
};

probe/or-somewhere() {
	...
	pair->private = pair_priv;
	pair->private_size = sizeof(*pair_priv);
	...
}