Re: [PATCH] net/3com/3c515: Fix MODULE_ARCH_VERMAGIC redefinition

[Leon Romanovsky]

On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:07:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 07:55:55 +0300
>
> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 09:03:41PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 17:56:23 +0200
> >>
> >> > From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > Change the include order so that MODULE_ARCH_VERMAGIC from the arch
> >> > header arch/x86/include/asm/module.h gets used instead of the fallback
> >> > from include/linux/vermagic.h and thus fix:
> >> >
> >> >   In file included from ./include/linux/module.h:30,
> >> >                    from drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c515.c:56:
> >> >   ./arch/x86/include/asm/module.h:73: warning: "MODULE_ARCH_VERMAGIC" redefined
> >> >      73 | # define MODULE_ARCH_VERMAGIC MODULE_PROC_FAMILY
> >> >         |
> >> >   In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c515.c:25:
> >> >   ./include/linux/vermagic.h:28: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> >> >      28 | #define MODULE_ARCH_VERMAGIC ""
> >> >         |
> >> >
> >> > Fixes: 6bba2e89a88c ("net/3com: Delete driver and module versions from 3com drivers")
> >> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> I'm so confused, that commit in the Fixes: tag is _removing_ code but adding
> >> new #include directives?!?!
> >>
> >> Is vermagic.h really needed in these files?
> >
> > You are completely right, it is not needed at all in those files.
>
> Ok let's just remove it to fix this.

Thanks a lot.

How do you want us to handle it? Boris resend, me to send, you to fix?

Thanks