Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: A lot of comments
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Mon Apr 13 2020 - 17:58:39 EST
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-04-13 10:04:11)
> I've been pouring through the rpmh-rsc code and trying to understand
> it. Document everything to the best of my ability. All documentation
> here is strictly from code analysis--no actual knowledge of the
> hardware was used. If something is wrong in here I either
> misunderstood the code, had a typo, or the code has a bug in it
> leading to my incorrect understanding.
>
> In a few places here I have documented things that don't make tons of
> sense. A future patch will try to address this. While this means I'm
> adding comments / todos and then later fixing them in the series, it
> seemed more urgent to get things documented first so that people could
> understand the later patches.
>
> Any comments I adjusted I also tried to make match kernel-doc better.
> Specifically:
> - kernel-doc says do not leave a blank line between the function
> description and the arguments
> - kernel-doc examples always have things starting w/ a capital and
> ending with a period.
>
> This should be a no-op. It's just comment changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index c9e5cddbc099..f0a7ada0c16f 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -171,12 +171,38 @@ static void write_tcs_reg_sync(struct rsc_drv *drv, int reg, int tcs_id,
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * tcs_is_free() - Return if a TCS is totally free.
> + * @drv: The RSC controller.
> + * @tcs_id: The global ID of this TCS.
> + *
> + * Returns true if nobody has claimed this TCS (by setting tcs_in_use).
> + * If the TCS looks free, checks that the hardware agrees.
> + *
> + * Must be called with the drv->lock held or the tcs_lock for the TCS being
I think we have 'Context:' for these sorts of things.
> + * tested. If only the tcs_lock is held then it is possible that this
> + * function will return that a tcs is still busy when it has been recently
> + * been freed but it will never return free when a TCS is actually in use.
> + *
> + * Return: true if the given TCS is free.
> + */
> static bool tcs_is_free(struct rsc_drv *drv, int tcs_id)
> {
> return !test_bit(tcs_id, drv->tcs_in_use) &&
> read_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_STATUS, tcs_id);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * tcs_invalidate() - Invalidate all TCSes of the given type (sleep or wake).
> + * @drv: The RSC controller.
> + * @type: SLEEP_TCS or WAKE_TCS
> + *
> + * This will clear the "slots" variable of the given tcs_group and also
> + * tell the hardware to forget about all entries.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 if no problem, or -EAGAIN if the caller should try again in a
> + * bit. Caller should make sure to enable interrupts between tries.
> + */
> static int tcs_invalidate(struct rsc_drv *drv, int type)
> {
> int m;
> @@ -624,6 +798,23 @@ static bool rpmh_rsc_ctrlr_is_busy(struct rsc_drv *drv)
> return false;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * rpmh_rsc_cpu_pm_callback() - Check if any of the AMCs are busy.
> + * @nfb: Pointer to the notifier block in struct rsc_drv.
> + * @action: CPU_PM_ENTER, CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED, or CPU_PM_EXIT.
> + * @v: Unused
> + *
> + * This function is given to cpu_pm_register_notifier so we can be informed
> + * about when CPUs go down. When all CPUs go down we know no more active
> + * transfers will be started so we write sleep/wake sets. This function gets
> + * called from cpuidle code paths and also at system suspend time.
> + *
> + * If its last CPU going down and AMCs are not busy then writes cached sleep
> + * and wake messages to TCSes. The firmware then takes care of triggering
> + * them when entering deepest low power modes.
> + *
> + * Return: See cpu_pm_register_notifier.
cpu_pm_register_notifier()
> + */
> static int rpmh_rsc_cpu_pm_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> unsigned long action, void *v)
> {