Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: Fix mtd not the same name not registered if nvmem

[Ricardo Ribalda Delgado]

Ping?

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:59 AM Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
<ribalda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When the nvmem framework is enabled, a nvmem device is created per mtd
> device/partition.
>
> It is not uncommon that a device can have multiple mtd devices with
> partitions that have the same name. Eg, when there DT overlay is allowed
> and the same device with mtd is attached twice.
>
> Under that circumstances, the mtd fails to register due to a name
> duplication on the nvmem framework.
>
> With this patch we add a _1, _2, _X to the subsequent names if there is
> a collition, and throw a warning, instead of not starting the mtd
> device.
>
> [    8.948991] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/nvmem/devices/Production Data'
> [    8.948992] CPU: 7 PID: 246 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.5.0-qtec-standard #13
> [    8.948993] Hardware name: AMD Dibbler/Dibbler, BIOS 05.22.04.0019 10/26/2019
> [    8.948994] Call Trace:
> [    8.948996]  dump_stack+0x50/0x70
> [    8.948998]  sysfs_warn_dup.cold+0x17/0x2d
> [    8.949000]  sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.0+0xc2/0xd0
> [    8.949002]  bus_add_device+0x74/0x140
> [    8.949004]  device_add+0x34b/0x850
> [    8.949006]  nvmem_register.part.0+0x1bf/0x640
> ...
> [    8.948926] mtd mtd8: Failed to register NVMEM device
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: I left behind on my patch a
>
> mtd->nvmem = NULL;
>
> from my tests. Sorry.
>
>  drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> index 5fac4355b9c2..7a4b520ef3b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>  #include <linux/leds.h>
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>  #include <linux/nvmem-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
>
>  #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>  #include <linux/mtd/partitions.h>
> @@ -545,13 +546,34 @@ static int mtd_nvmem_reg_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
>         return retlen == bytes ? 0 : -EIO;
>  }
>
> +static int nvmem_next_name(const char *init_name, char *name, size_t len)
> +{
> +       unsigned int i = 0;
> +       int ret = 0;
> +       struct nvmem_device *dev = NULL;
> +
> +       strlcpy(name, init_name, len);
> +
> +       while ((ret < len) &&
> +              !IS_ERR(dev = nvmem_device_find(name, device_match_name))) {
> +               nvmem_device_put(dev);
> +               ret = snprintf(name, len, "%s_%u", init_name, ++i);
> +       }
> +
> +       if (ret >= len)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       return i;
> +}
> +
>  static int mtd_nvmem_add(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  {
>         struct nvmem_config config = {};
> +       char name[128];
> +       int ret = 0;
>
>         config.id = -1;
>         config.dev = &mtd->dev;
> -       config.name = mtd->name;
>         config.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>         config.reg_read = mtd_nvmem_reg_read;
>         config.size = mtd->size;
> @@ -562,6 +584,13 @@ static int mtd_nvmem_add(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>         config.no_of_node = true;
>         config.priv = mtd;
>
> +       if (mtd->name) {
> +               ret = nvmem_next_name(mtd->name, name, sizeof(name));
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       return ret;
> +               config.name = name;
> +       }
> +
>         mtd->nvmem = nvmem_register(&config);
>         if (IS_ERR(mtd->nvmem)) {
>                 /* Just ignore if there is no NVMEM support in the kernel */
> @@ -573,6 +602,10 @@ static int mtd_nvmem_add(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>                 }
>         }
>
> +       if (ret)
> +               dev_warn(&mtd->dev, "mtdev %s renamed to %s due to name collision",
> +                               mtd->name, nvmem_dev_name(mtd->nvmem));
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>