Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: cpufeature: Relax checks for AArch32 support at EL[0-2]

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 04/15/2020 11:58 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:50:58AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > On 04/14/2020 10:31 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > We don't need to be quite as strict about mismatched AArch32 support,
> > > which is good because the friendly hardware folks have been busy
> > > mismatching this to their hearts' content.
> > >
> > >     * We don't care about EL2 or EL3 (there are silly comments concerning
> > >       the latter, so remove those)
> > >
> > >     * EL1 support is gated by the ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1 capability and handled
> > >       gracefully when a mismatch occurs
> > >
> > >     * EL1 support is gated by the ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0 capability and handled
> >
> > s/EL1/EL0
> >
> > >       gracefully when a mismatch occurs
> > >
> > > Relax the AArch32 checks to FTR_NONSTRICT.
> >
> > Agreed. We should do something similar for the features exposed by the
> > ELF_HWCAP, of course in a separate series.
>
> Hmm, I didn't think we needed to touch the HWCAPs, as they're derived from
> the sanitised feature register values. What am I missing?

sorry, that was cryptic. I was suggesting to relax the ftr fields to
NONSTRICT for the fields covered by ELF HWCAPs (and other CPU hwcaps).

Suzuki