Re: [PATCH pinctrl REGRESSION] Revert "pinctrl: mvebu: armada-37xx: use use platform api"

[Marek Behun]

On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:53:07 +0200
Pali RohÃr <pali@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tuesday 07 April 2020 13:52:30 Pali RohÃr wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 March 2020 13:20:17 Andrew Lunn wrote:  
> > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:44:13AM +0100, Marek BehÃn wrote:  
> > > > This reverts commit 06e26b75f5e613b400116fdb7ff6206a681ab271.
> > > > 
> > > > This commit caused a regression on Armada 37xx. The pinctrl driver says
> > > >   armada-37xx-pinctrl d0013800.pinctrl: invalid or no IRQ
> > > >   armada-37xx-pinctrl d0018800.pinctrl: invalid or no IRQ
> > > > and afterwards other drivers cannot use GPIOs by this driver as IRQs.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 06e26b75f5e6 ("pinctrl: mvebu: armada-37xx: use use platform...")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marek BehÃn <marek.behun@xxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c | 12 +++---------
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
> > > > index 32f12a388b3c..5f125bd6279d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-37xx.c
> > > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> > > >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
> > > > @@ -741,14 +742,7 @@ static int armada_37xx_irqchip_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > > >  		return ret;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -	nr_irq_parent = platform_irq_count(pdev);  
> > > 
> > > Hi Marek
> > > 
> > > Could you determine the value of nr_irq_parent(). Is it -EPROBE_DEFER?  
> > 
> > Hello Andrew! I have tested it with 5.6 kernel and return value in
> > nr_irq_parent is in both cases zero. So it is not -EPROBE_DEFER. And
> > return value of of_irq_count(np) is 12 for d0013800.pinctrl and 5 for
> > d0018800.pinctrl.  
> 
> Adding Jason, Gregory and Sebastian into the loop.
> 
> Could you please look at this problem? If there is no easy solution,
> I would suggest to revert problematic commit as pinctrl in current state
> is broken and unusable.

Pali, the commit is already reverted in upstream.