Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: add the time namespace support

[Vincenzo Frascino]

Hi Andrei,

On 4/15/20 5:14 PM, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:02 AM Vincenzo Frascino
> <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrei,
>>
>> On 4/11/20 8:33 AM, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:23 AM Vincenzo Frascino
>>> <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have though a question on something I encountered during the testing of the
>>>> patches: I noticed that all the tests related to CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM fail on
>>>> arm64 (please find the results below the scissors). Is this expected?
>>>
>>> static int alarm_clock_get_timespec(clockid_t which_clock, struct
>>> timespec64 *tp)
>>> {
>>>         struct alarm_base *base = &alarm_bases[clock2alarm(which_clock)];
>>>
>>>         if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev())
>>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> It is probably that you get EINVAL from here ^^^. I will send a
>>> separate patch to handle this case in tests properly.
>>>
>>
>> This makes sense :) Please let me know when you post the fix so I can test it again.
> 
> I have sent this fix: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/15/72
>

That's good, I will try it by the end of this week or beginning of next and let
you know the results.

>>
>> Are you planning as well to rebase this set?>
> What is the right tree to rebase on?
> 

I guess master, I was asking because it would make easier my testing :)

> Thanks,
> Andrei
> 

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo