Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add hpd-gpios to the bindings

[Laurent Pinchart]

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:53:02PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-04-15 08:48:40)
> > Allow people to specify to use a GPIO for hot-plug-detect.  Add an
> > example.
> > 
> > NOTE: The current patch adding support for hpd-gpios to the Linux
> > driver for hpd-gpios only adds enough support to the driver so that
> > the bridge can use one of its own GPIOs.  The bindings, however, are
> > written generically.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> >  .../bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml          | 10 +++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml
> > index 8cacc6db33a9..554bfd003000 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi86.yaml
> > @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ properties:
> >      const: 1
> >      description: See ../../pwm/pwm.yaml for description of the cell formats.
> >  
> > +  hpd-gpios:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +    description: If present use the given GPIO for hot-plug-detect.
> 
> Shouldn't this go in the panel node? And the panel driver should get the
> gpio and poll it after powering up the panel? Presumably that's why we
> have the no-hpd property in the simple panel binding vs. putting it here
> in the bridge.

Same question really, I think this belongs to the panel (or connector)
node indeed.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart