Re: [PATCH 0/8] Relax sanity checking for mismatched AArch32 EL1

[Sai Prakash Ranjan]

On 2020-04-16 14:09, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> On 2020-04-15 03:01, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For better or worse, there are SoCs in production where some, but not
> > all of the CPUs, support AArch32 at EL1 and above. Right now, that
> > results in "SANITY CHECK" warnings during boot and an unconditional
> > kernel taint.
> >
> > This patch series tries to do a bit better: the only time we care 
> > about
> > AArch32 at EL1 is for KVM, so rather than throw our toys out of the
> > pram, we can instead just disable support for 32-bit guests on these
> > systems. In the unlikely scenario of a late CPU hotplug being the 
> > first
> > time we notice that AArch32 is not available, then we fail the hotplug
> > (right now we let the thing come online, which leads to hilarious
> > results for any pre-existing 32-bit guests).
> >
> > Feedback welcome,
> >
> > Will
>
> Thanks Will, tested this series on QCOM SC7180 and SM8150 SoCs.
>
> For the entire series,
>
> Tested-by: saiprakash.ranjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Urgh sorry, it should be

Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation