Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/split_lock: Bits in IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES are not architectural

[Thomas Gleixner]

"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:07:37PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> as I fear that the infinite wisdom of HW folks will add yet another
>> variant in the foreseeable future, I used a switch() right away and
>> tweaked the comments a bit.
>> 
>> Can you have a look, please?
>
> Looks like you are all ready for "case 2:" when Intel produces
> a less sucky implementation of split lock detect. Don't hold your
> breath waiting for that :-)

Surely not.

I'm still hoping to see quirkless TSCs and timers, sane IRET semantics
and the demise of non-maskable MSIs before my retirement. Not that I
believe it will happen, it's just because hope dies last.

> Looks good. Should be a useful template for any future
> bits that show up in CORE_CAPABILITIES.

Groan. No!

Thanks,

        tglx