Re: [RFC net-next v5 9/9] bridge: mrp: Integrate MRP into the bridge

[Nikolay Aleksandrov]

On 14/04/2020 14:26, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> To integrate MRP into the bridge, the bridge needs to do the following:
> - add new flag(BR_MPP_AWARE) to the net bridge ports, this bit will be set when
>   the port is added to an MRP instance. In this way it knows if the frame was
>   received on MRP ring port
> - detect if the MRP frame was received on MRP ring port in that case it would be
>   processed otherwise just forward it as usual.
> - enable parsing of MRP
> - before whenever the bridge was set up, it would set all the ports in
>   forwarding state. Add an extra check to not set ports in forwarding state if
>   the port is an MRP ring port. The reason of this change is that if the MRP
>   instance initially sets the port in blocked state by setting the bridge up it
>   would overwrite this setting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/if_bridge.h |  1 +
>  net/bridge/br_device.c    |  3 +++
>  net/bridge/br_if.c        |  2 ++
>  net/bridge/br_input.c     |  3 +++
>  net/bridge/br_netlink.c   |  5 +++++
>  net/bridge/br_private.h   | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  net/bridge/br_stp.c       |  6 ++++++
>  net/bridge/br_stp_if.c    |  5 +++++
>  8 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
> index 9e57c4411734..10baa9efdae8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct br_ip_list {
>  #define BR_BCAST_FLOOD		BIT(14)
>  #define BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS	BIT(15)
>  #define BR_ISOLATED		BIT(16)
> +#define BR_MRP_AWARE		BIT(17)
>  
>  #define BR_DEFAULT_AGEING_TIME	(300 * HZ)
>  
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c b/net/bridge/br_device.c
> index 0e3dbc5f3c34..8ec1362588af 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_device.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_device.c
> @@ -463,6 +463,9 @@ void br_dev_setup(struct net_device *dev)
>  	spin_lock_init(&br->lock);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&br->port_list);
>  	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&br->fdb_list);
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&br->mrp_list);
> +#endif
>  	spin_lock_init(&br->hash_lock);
>  
>  	br->bridge_id.prio[0] = 0x80;
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> index 4fe30b182ee7..ca685c0cdf95 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,8 @@ static void del_nbp(struct net_bridge_port *p)
>  	br_stp_disable_port(p);
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
>  
> +	br_mrp_port_del(br, p);
> +
>  	br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_DELLINK, NULL, p);
>  
>  	list_del_rcu(&p->list);
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> index fcc260840028..d5c34f36f0f4 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> @@ -342,6 +342,9 @@ rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (unlikely(br_mrp_process(p, skb)))
> +		return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
> +
>  forward:
>  	switch (p->state) {
>  	case BR_STATE_FORWARDING:
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> index 43dab4066f91..8826fcd1eb76 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> @@ -669,6 +669,11 @@ static int br_afspec(struct net_bridge *br,
>  			if (err)
>  				return err;
>  			break;
> +		case IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP:
> +			err = br_mrp_parse(br, p, attr, cmd, extack);
> +			if (err)
> +				return err;
> +			break;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 1f97703a52ff..5835828320b6 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -428,6 +428,10 @@ struct net_bridge {
>  	int offload_fwd_mark;
>  #endif
>  	struct hlist_head		fdb_list;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> +	struct list_head		__rcu mrp_list;
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  struct br_input_skb_cb {
> @@ -1304,6 +1308,37 @@ unsigned long br_timer_value(const struct timer_list *timer);
>  extern int (*br_fdb_test_addr_hook)(struct net_device *dev, unsigned char *addr);
>  #endif
>  
> +/* br_mrp.c */
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> +int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
> +		 struct nlattr *attr, int cmd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> +int br_mrp_process(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct sk_buff *skb);
> +bool br_mrp_enabled(struct net_bridge *br);
> +void br_mrp_port_del(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p);
> +#else
> +static inline int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
> +			       struct nlattr *attr, int cmd,
> +			       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int br_mrp_process(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool br_mrp_enabled(struct net_bridge *br)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void br_mrp_port_del(struct net_bridge *br,
> +				   struct net_bridge_port *p)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  /* br_netlink.c */
>  extern struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops;
>  int br_netlink_init(void);
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> index 1f14b8455345..3e88be7aa269 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ void br_set_state(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned int state)
>  	};
>  	int err;
>  
> +	/* Don't change the state of the ports if they are driven by a different
> +	 * protocol.
> +	 */
> +	if (p->flags & BR_MRP_AWARE)
> +		return;
> +
>  	p->state = state;
>  	err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
>  	if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> index d174d3a566aa..542b212d5033 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,11 @@ void br_stp_set_enabled(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
>  {
>  	ASSERT_RTNL();
>  
> +	if (br_mrp_enabled(br)) {
> +		br_warn(br, "STP can't be enabled if MRP is already enabled\n");

It'd be nice if this can be returned in an extack if this function is called from netlink.
In addition this must return an error - otherwise writing to the sysfs file would be successful
while nothing will have changed, so the user will think it worked. Check out set_stp_state().
You can drop the br_warn, just make sure to return proper extack error from netlink (it is
the preferred interface over sysfs, so simply returning an error for sysfs would be enough).

> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (val) {
>  		if (br->stp_enabled == BR_NO_STP)
>  			br_stp_start(br);
>