Re:Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Remove an unnecessary condition check in reserve_bo_and_cond_vms()

[èåå]

åääïMarkus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
åéææï2020-04-19 02:18:06
æääïBernard Zhao <bernard@xxxxxxxx>,Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>,"Christian KÃnig" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>,amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
æéäï"Felix KÃhling" <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>,linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,opensource.kernel@xxxxxxxx,Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@xxxxxxx>,Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>,David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
äéïRe: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Remove an unnecessary condition check in reserve_bo_and_cond_vms()>> There is no need to if check again,
>
>Thanks for this information.
>
>* Should the function name be mentioned in this change description?
>
>* Would you like to adjust the patch subject?
>
>
>> maybe we could merge into the above else branch.
>
>I suggest to reconsider this wording.
>
>
>â
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
>> @@ -735,10 +735,8 @@ static int reserve_bo_and_cond_vms(struct kgd_mem *mem,
>â
>
>I propose to take further coding style aspects into account.
>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=90280eaa88ac1a9140dc759941123530d5545bb6#n191
>
>Possible refactoring:
>	if (ret) {
>		pr_err(â);
>		â
>	} else {
>		ctx->reserved = true;
>	}
>
>
>How do you think about to add the tag âFixesâ?
>

Sure, I will modify the code and adjust this patch subject. I will submit it again.

>Regards,
>Markus