Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] task_isolation: userspace hard isolation from kernel

[Alex Belits]

On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 11:00 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Once the task has returned to userspace after issuing the prctl(),
> > if it enters the kernel again via system call, page fault, or any
> > other exception or irq, the kernel will kill it with SIGKILL.
> 
> I could easily imagine myself using task isolation, but not with the
> SIGKILL semantics. SIGKILL causes data loss. Please at least let
> users choose what signal to send.

This is already done, even though the documentation is not updated.
There is even a userspace library that deals with this while
compensating for possible race conditions on isolation entry and
automatic re-entry after isolation is broken: 
https://github.com/abelits/libtmc

-- 
Alex