Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: phy: add Broadcom BCM54140 support

[Andrew Lunn]

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:12:48PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:

Hi Michael

> +static int bcm54140_b0_workaround(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	int spare3;
> +	int ret;

Could you add a comment about what this is working around?

> +static int bcm54140_phy_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	struct bcm54140_phy_priv *priv;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(&phydev->mdio.dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	phydev->priv = priv;
> +
> +	ret = bcm54140_get_base_addr_and_port(phydev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	dev_info(&phydev->mdio.dev,
> +		 "probed (port %d, base PHY address %d)\n",
> +		 priv->port, priv->base_addr);

phydev_dbg() ? Do we need to see this message four times?

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int bcm54140_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	u16 reg = 0xffff;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Apply hardware errata */
> +	ret = bcm54140_b0_workaround(phydev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Unmask events we are interested in. */
> +	reg &= ~(BCM54140_RDB_INT_DUPLEX |
> +		 BCM54140_RDB_INT_SPEED |
> +		 BCM54140_RDB_INT_LINK);
> +	ret = bcm_phy_write_rdb(phydev, BCM54140_RDB_IMR, reg);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* LED1=LINKSPD[1], LED2=LINKSPD[2], LED3=ACTIVITY */
> +	ret = bcm_phy_modify_rdb(phydev, BCM54140_RDB_SPARE1,
> +				 0, BCM54140_RDB_SPARE1_LSLM);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

What are the reset default for LEDs? Can the LEDs be configured via
strapping pins? There is currently no good solution for this. Whatever
you pick will be wrong for somebody else. At minimum, strapping pins,
if they exist, should not be overridden.