Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Put driver tag in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list() when no budget

From: Bart Van Assche
Date: Mon Apr 20 2020 - 08:48:44 EST


On 4/20/20 1:22 AM, John Garry wrote:
On 18/04/2020 03:43, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 2020-04-16 04:18, John Garry wrote:
If in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list() we find no budget, then we break of the
dispatch loop, but the request may keep the driver tag, evaulated
in 'nxt' in the previous loop iteration.

Fix by putting the driver tag for that request.

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 8e56884fd2e9..a7785df2c944 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1222,8 +1222,10 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ rq = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (!got_budget && !blk_mq_get_dispatch_budget(hctx))
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (!got_budget && !blk_mq_get_dispatch_budget(hctx)) {
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ blk_mq_put_driver_tag(rq);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ break;
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ }
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (!blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq)) {
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ /*

Is this something that can only happen if q->mq_ops->queue_rq(hctx, &bd)
returns another value than BLK_STS_OK, BLK_STS_RESOURCE and
BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE?

Right, as that case is handled in blk_mq_handle_dev_resource()

If so, please add a comment in the source code
that explains this.

So important that we should now do this in an extra patch?

Probably not, unless someone else feels strongly about this.

Thanks,

Bart.