Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: slave-eeprom: support additional models

[Wolfram Sang]

On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 11:40:06AM -0500, Patrick Williams wrote:
> Add support for emulating the following EEPROMs:
>     * 24c01  - 1024 bit
>     * 24c128 - 128k bit
>     * 24c256 - 256k bit
>     * 24c512 - 512k bit
> 
> The flag bits in the device id were shifted up 1 bit to make
> room for saving the 24c512's size.  24c512 uses the full 16-bit
> address space of a 2-byte addressable EEPROM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Williams <alpawi@xxxxxxxxxx>

Do you really need them or is it just nice to have?

I am undecided. I definately don't want all the EEPROM types which
exist, but the full 16 bit address range makes sense...

More opinions welcome.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature