[PATCH v3 2/4] remoteproc: Restructure firmware name allocation

[Mathieu Poirier]

Improve the readability of function rproc_alloc_firmware() by using
a non-negated condition and moving the comment out of the conditional
block

Suggested-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index db8a15fc1e4a..45529d40342f 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2011,14 +2011,14 @@ static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc *rproc,
 {
 	const char *p;
 
-	if (!firmware)
-		/*
-		 * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then
-		 * construct a default name.
-		 */
-		p = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "rproc-%s-fw", name);
-	else
+	/*
+	 * Allocate a firmware name if the caller gave us one to work
+	 * with.  Otherwise construct a new one using a default pattern.
+	 */
+	if (firmware)
 		p = kstrdup_const(firmware, GFP_KERNEL);
+	else
+		p = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "rproc-%s-fw", name);
 
 	if (!p)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.20.1