Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: bcm2835: Switch to use %ptT

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 11:53:58AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/04/15 20:00), Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> [..]
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c b/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c
> > index da26a584dca0..a3e85186f8e6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c
> > @@ -182,16 +182,10 @@ rpi_firmware_print_firmware_revision(struct rpi_firmware *fw)
> >  					RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_FIRMWARE_REVISION,
> >  					&packet, sizeof(packet));
> >  
> > -	if (ret == 0) {
> > -		struct tm tm;
> > -
> > -		time64_to_tm(packet, 0, &tm);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return;
> >  
> > -		dev_info(fw->cl.dev,
> > -			 "Attached to firmware from %04ld-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d\n",
> > -			 tm.tm_year + 1900, tm.tm_mon + 1, tm.tm_mday,
> > -			 tm.tm_hour, tm.tm_min);
> > -	}
> > +	dev_info(fw->cl.dev, "Attached to firmware from %ptT\n", &packet);
> >  }
> 
> So can this be instead:
> 
> 	struct rtc_time tm;
> 
> 	rtc_time64_to_tm(time, &tm);
> 	dev_info(.... "%ptR", &tm);
> 
> ?
> 
> If it can, then I'd probably say something like "can we then just use
> rtc_time64_to_tm()"?

Same comment as per previous patch (TL;DR: no, it can't).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko