Re: [Patch v3 1/9] spi: bcm-qspi: Handle clock probe deferral
From: Mark Brown
Date: Tue Apr 21 2020 - 11:06:10 EST
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:08:45 -0400, Kamal Dasu wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The clock provider may not be ready by the time spi-bcm-qspi gets
> probed, handle probe deferral using devm_clk_get_optional().
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-5.7
Thanks!
[1/9] spi: bcm-qspi: Handle clock probe deferral
commit: 0392727c261bab65a35cd4f82ee9459bc237591d
[2/9] dt: bindings: spi: Add support for mspi on brcmstb SoCs
(not applied)
[3/9] spi: bcm-qspi: Handle lack of MSPI_REV offset
(not applied)
[4/9] spi: bcm-qspi: Drive MSPI peripheral SSb pin on cs_change
commit: 742d5958062488d03082a9ff01a6afb3cf7bd634
[5/9] spi: bcm-qspi: when tx/rx buffer is NULL set to 0
commit: 4df3bea7f9d2ddd9ac2c29ba945c7c4db2def29c
[6/9] spi: bcm-qspi: Make PM suspend/resume work with SCMI clock management
commit: 1b7ad8c405c3dc0ad6c2dc61fe21fe7a446cceeb
[7/9] spi: bcm-qspi: Use fastbr setting to allow faster MSPI speeds
(not applied)
[8/9] spi: bcm-qspi: add support for MSPI sys clk 108Mhz
(not applied)
[9/9] spi: bcm-qspi: MSPI_SPCR0_MSB MSTR bit exists only on legacy controllers
(not applied)
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark