Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: VMX: Handle preemption timer fastpath

[Wanpeng Li]

On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 19:40, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 21/04/20 13:20, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > +
> > +     if (!vmx->req_immediate_exit &&
> > +             !unlikely(vmx->loaded_vmcs->hv_timer_soft_disabled)) {
> > +             if (!vmx_interrupt_allowed(vcpu) ||

For non-APICv case, we need to request interrupt-window.

> > +                     !apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic) ||

Now just add fastpath for tscdeadline mode.

> > +                     vmx->rmode.vm86_active ||
> > +                     is_smm(vcpu) ||
> > +                     !kvm_apic_hw_enabled(apic))

These stuff can be removed, kvm_apic_hw_enable() is check in
vmx_fast_deliver_interrupt().

> > +                     return EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE;
> > +
> > +             if (!apic->lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use)
> > +                     return EXIT_FASTPATH_CONT_RUN;
> > +
> > +             WARN_ON(swait_active(&vcpu->wq));
> > +             vmx_cancel_hv_timer(vcpu);
> > +             apic->lapic_timer.hv_timer_in_use = false;
> > +
> > +             if (atomic_read(&apic->lapic_timer.pending))
> > +                     return EXIT_FASTPATH_CONT_RUN;

Other two checks are the same in kvm_lapic_expired_hv_timer().

    Wanpeng

> > +
> > +             ktimer->expired_tscdeadline = ktimer->tscdeadline;
> > +             vmx_fast_deliver_interrupt(vcpu);
> > +             ktimer->tscdeadline = 0;
> > +             return EXIT_FASTPATH_CONT_RUN;
> > +     }
> > +
>
> Can you explain all the checks you have here, and why you need something
> more complex than apic_timer_expired (possibly by adding some
> optimizations to kvm_apic_local_deliver)?  This code is impossible to
> maintain.
>
> Paolo
>