Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context

[Kai-Heng Feng]

> On Apr 23, 2020, at 14:49, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context.
>> 
>> Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This fixes a regression, right? So there should be a Fixes line.

Yes, but the regression commit isn't in Linus' tree, so the sha1 may change.

Kai-Heng

> 
> Also I can't take this until patch 1 is in my tree. And I don't know who
> takes iopoll.h patches.
> 
> -- 
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches