Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfsd4: stid display should preserve on-the-wire byte order

From: J. Bruce Fields
Date: Thu Apr 23 2020 - 16:49:36 EST


By the way, one other thing I noticed, in the "states" file there's a
field like:

superblock: "fd:10:114"

That's major:minor:inode number, which is the same thing /proc/locks
uses to identify files. "superblock" makes sense for the "major:minor"
part, but the inode number is for the one file, not the superblock. So
that probably should have been

superblock: "fd:10:114", inode: 114

or something. Oh well. It's been that way in a few kernel versions now
so I guess it's not worth breaking backwards compatibility.

--b.