Re: [PATCH 1/2] locking/rtmutex: Remove unused rt_mutex_cmpxchg_relaxed()

From: Alex Shi
Date: Sun Apr 26 2020 - 08:06:56 EST


This 2 small patches may missed for a few time.

Is it ok to be merged?

Thanks
Alex

在 2020/4/17 下午10:50, Alex Shi 写道:
> This macro isn't interested by anyone, so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> index c9f090d64f00..cfdd5b93264d 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
> * set up.
> */
> #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
> -# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_relaxed(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_relaxed(&l->owner, c, n) == c)
> # define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_acquire(&l->owner, c, n) == c)
> # define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_release(&l->owner, c, n) == c)
>
> @@ -202,7 +201,6 @@ static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock,
> }
>
> #else
> -# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_relaxed(l,c,n) (0)
> # define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(l,c,n) (0)
> # define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(l,c,n) (0)
>
>