Re: mmotm 2020-04-26-00-15 uploaded (mm/madvise.c)

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Sun Apr 26 2020 - 13:26:09 EST


On 4/26/20 12:16 AM, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2020-04-26-00-15 has been uploaded to
>
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>
> mmotm-readme.txt says
>
> README for mm-of-the-moment:
>
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>
> This is a snapshot of my -mm patch queue. Uploaded at random hopefully
> more than once a week.
>
> You will need quilt to apply these patches to the latest Linus release (5.x
> or 5.x-rcY). The series file is in broken-out.tar.gz and is duplicated in
> http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/series
>
> The file broken-out.tar.gz contains two datestamp files: .DATE and
> .DATE-yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss. Both contain the string yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss,
> followed by the base kernel version against which this patch series is to
> be applied.

Hi,
I'm seeing lots of build failures in mm/madvise.c.

Is Minchin's patch only partially applied or is it just missing some pieces?

a. mm/madvise.c needs to #include <linux/uio.h>

b. looks like the sys_process_madvise() prototype in <linux/syscalls.h>
has not been updated:

In file included from ../mm/madvise.c:11:0:
../include/linux/syscalls.h:239:18: error: conflicting types for âsys_process_madviseâ
asmlinkage long sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__)) \
^
../include/linux/syscalls.h:225:2: note: in expansion of macro â__SYSCALL_DEFINExâ
__SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/linux/syscalls.h:219:36: note: in expansion of macro âSYSCALL_DEFINExâ
#define SYSCALL_DEFINE6(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(6, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../mm/madvise.c:1295:1: note: in expansion of macro âSYSCALL_DEFINE6â
SYSCALL_DEFINE6(process_madvise, int, which, pid_t, upid,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../mm/madvise.c:11:0:
../include/linux/syscalls.h:880:17: note: previous declaration of âsys_process_madviseâ was here
asmlinkage long sys_process_madvise(int which, pid_t pid, unsigned long start,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

thanks.
--
~Randy