Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel LGM SoC

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Boris,

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Sat, 18 Apr
2020 10:55:33 +0200:

> On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:21:47 +0800
> "Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX"
> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This patch adds the new IP of Nand Flash Controller(NFC) support
> > on Intel's Lightning Mountain(LGM) SoC.
> > 
> > DMA is used for burst data transfer operation, also DMA HW supports
> > aligned 32bit memory address and aligned data access by default.
> > DMA burst of 8 supported. Data register used to support the read/write
> > operation from/to device.
> > 
> > NAND controller driver implements ->exec_op() to replace legacy hooks,
> > these specific call-back method to execute NAND operations.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig          |   7 +
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Makefile         |   1 +
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel_lgm_nand.c | 740 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++  
> 
> I wonder if we shouldn't name the driver infineon-nand-controller.c
> since the original design comes from Infineon IIUC. intel_lgm_nand.c is
> definitely misleading, as we also have a nand_intel.c file which is for
> Intel NAND chips (not NAND controllers). If we keep intel in the name,
> let's at least add a "-controller" suffix to make it clear.
> 
> Side note for Miquel: I guess we would also benefit from having a clear
> core vs controller-drivers split as recently done for spi-nor (a
> controller subdir has been created).

I would even like a core vs controller drivers vs nand chips drivers.

Macronix for instance has a NAND controller driver and a NAND chip
driver, that's why, even if it is a bit long, I enforce the -nfc or
-nand-controller (my favorite) suffix now.

Thanks,
MiquÃl