Re: [mm/debug] fa6726c1e7: kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h
From: Anshuman Khandual
Date: Mon Apr 27 2020 - 23:54:19 EST
On 04/28/2020 08:21 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 27, 2020, at 10:35 PM, Anshuman Khandual <Anshuman.Khandual@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Letting CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE enabled via CONFIG_EXPERT for unsupported
>> platforms i.e without ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE, was a conscious decision
>> meant to expand it's adaptability and coverage without requiring any code
>> (i.e Kconfig) change. The easier it is to enable the test on unsupported
>> platforms right now, more folks are likely to try it out thus increasing
>> it's probability to get fixed on those platforms. That is a valid enough
>> reason to have CONFIG_EXPERT based enablement method, IMHO. Also even with
>> CONFIG_EXPERT set, CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE does not get enabled by default
>> automatically.
>
> No, I am talking about PAE. There is a distinction between known broken that nobody cares (like arm32) and in-progress/unknown status (like s390).
>
> Also, it is not very nice to introduce regressions for robots when testing PAE because they always select CONFIG__EXPERT and CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.
Okay, will add X86_PAE to the explicitly disabled list along with
IA64 and ARM.
----
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 04:30:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] mm/debug/pgtable: Completely disable X86_PAE
Completely disable X86_PAE, even via CONFIG_EXPERT.
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 6a492e32579a..79e097a2285f 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ config DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS
config DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
bool "Debug arch page table for semantics compliance"
depends on MMU
- depends on !IA64 && !ARM
+ depends on !IA64 && !ARM && !X86_PAE
depends on ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE || EXPERT
default y if ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE && DEBUG_VM
help
--
Hello Andrew/Stephen,
Could you please fold the above patch in linux-next. Also please do
let me know if I should respin the series as well. Thank you.
- Anshuman