Re: [PATCH 2/7] signal: factor copy_siginfo_to_external32 from copy_siginfo_to_user32

From: Christophe Leroy
Date: Tue Apr 28 2020 - 03:46:03 EST




Le 28/04/2020 Ã 09:09, Christoph Hellwig a ÃcritÂ:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 03:40:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3473847.html
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3473840.html
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3473843.html

OK, but that doesn't necessitate the above monstrosity? How about

static int __copy_siginfo_to_user32(struct compat_siginfo __user *to,
const struct kernel_siginfo *from, bool x32_ABI)
{
struct compat_siginfo new;
copy_siginfo_to_external32(&new, from);
...
}

int copy_siginfo_to_user32(struct compat_siginfo __user *to,
const struct kernel_siginfo *from)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI) || defined(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION)
return __copy_siginfo_to_user32(to, from, in_x32_syscall());
#else
return __copy_siginfo_to_user32(to, from, 0);
#endif
}

Or something like that - I didn't try very hard. We know how to do
this stuff, and surely this thing isn't how!

I guess that might be a worthwhile middle ground. Still not a fan of
all these ifdefs..


Can't we move the small X32 specific part out of __copy_siginfo_to_user32(), in an arch specific helper that voids for other architectures ?

Something like:

if (!arch_special_something(&new, from)) {
new.si_utime = from->si_utime;
new.si_stime = from->si_stime;
}

Then the arch_special_something() does what it wants in x86 and returns 1, and for architectures not implementating it, a generic version return 0 all the time.

Christophe