Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add support for NXP TJA11xx

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:23 AM Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Document the NXP TJA11xx PHY bindings.

Given the discussion, I'd marked this one as "changes requested"
expecting a new version to review the schema. And gmail decided to
make a new thread due to the extra 'RE:'. So it fell off my radar.

This schema is fundamentally broken as there's no way to match for
when to apply this schema. How do we find a NXP TJA11xx PHY? I suppose
we can look for 'ethernet-phy' with a child node 'ethernet-phy', but
then that would apply to any phy like this one. This needs a
compatible string IMO given it is non-standard.

>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml  | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..42be0255512b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+

Dual license new bindings:

(GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)

> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: NXP TJA11xx PHY
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> +  - Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> +  - Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description:
> +  Bindings for NXP TJA11xx automotive PHYs

Perhaps some information about how this phy is special.

> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: ethernet-phy.yaml#

Not needed here as ethernet-phy.yaml already has a 'select' condition to apply.

> +
> +patternProperties:
> +  "^ethernet-phy@[0-9a-f]+$":
> +    type: object
> +    description: |
> +      Some packages have multiple PHYs. Secondary PHY should be defines as
> +      subnode of the first (parent) PHY.
> +
> +    properties:
> +      reg:
> +        minimum: 0
> +        maximum: 31
> +        description:
> +          The ID number for the child PHY. Should be +1 of parent PHY.
> +
> +    required:
> +      - reg
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    mdio {
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +        tja1101_phy0: ethernet-phy@4 {
> +            reg = <0x4>;
> +        };
> +    };
> +  - |
> +    mdio {
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +        tja1102_phy0: ethernet-phy@4 {
> +            reg = <0x4>;

> +            #address-cells = <1>;
> +            #size-cells = <0>;

These aren't documented.

> +
> +            tja1102_phy1: ethernet-phy@5 {
> +                reg = <0x5>;
> +            };
> +        };
> +    };
> --
> 2.25.1
>